Arizona Supreme Court Justice Clint Bolick weighs in on free speech after Jimmy Kimmel suspension
The U.S. Constitution guarantees the right to free speech, but lately free speech has been under attack. Arizona Supreme Court Justice Clint Bolick weighs in.
Watch: Inside the Arizona GOP: Talking key races, voter priorities and reaching Independent voters | 11 mins
PHOENIX — In light of late-night show host Jimmy Kimmel’s indefinite suspension for insensitive comments regarding the late Charlie Kirk, much public debate has risen on free speech and what should and shouldn’t be policed.
Arizona Supreme Court Justice Clint Bolick joined KTAR News 92.3 FM’s The Mike Broomhead Show on Friday to discuss speech regulation, and even referenced Kirk’s stance.
“I think Charlie Kirk himself had said it best. There is no such thing as legal hate speech that can be regulated or curtailed,” Bolick said. “It is speech, and all speech is protected. It’s only in the last couple of weeks that I’ve really seen anyone take on that subject, and it’s very discouraging.”
On ABC’s “Jimmy Kimmel Live!” on Monday night, Kimmel had made the accusation that “many in MAGA land are working very hard to capitalize on the murder of Charlie Kirk,” and ABC announced Kimmel’s suspension from the program on Wednesday.
Bolick, who was appointed the Arizona Supreme Court in 2016, also teaches at Arizona State University’s Sandra Day O’Connor College of Law and was scrutinized himself over comments he made in October 2024 by education advocacy group, Arizona Save Our Schools. The group filed a formal complaint that accused Bolick of not upholding impartial values after he pledged to fight for “conservative principles” while campaigning for reelection.
While speech that incites violence deserves greater scrutiny under law, Bolick said “the reaction that people get from speech is the very reason why it has to be protected.”
And with the Kimmel suspension, questions have also surfaced about the power of the Federal Communications Commission and its chair Brendan Carr, who stepped into the role in January.
“The moment that the government puts its fingers on the scale and coerces speech, that is clearly improper,” Bolick said.
The Supreme Court justice referenced recent examples of speech scrutiny by conservatives and liberals alike, boiling it down to the fact that “misinformation is in the eye of the beholder.” Whether it was Facebook cleansing during the Biden administration or Kimmel in the second Trump term, Bolick said media companies will not fight back “because they have too much on the line.”
One of most critical protections of the First Amendment is the U.S. government’s separation of powers, especially the exertion of authority between the legislative and executive branches, according to Bolick.
That is why Bolick said it’s important that Americans as individuals know the answer to this question: What really is freedom of speech?
“We either have universal free speech rights that apply to all of us, or we do not have free speech rights at all,” Bolick said.
Related
ABC suspends Jimmy Kimmel's late-night show over remarks about Charlie Kirk’s death
Everything you need to know about Charlie Kirk's memorial on Sunday at State Farm Stadium
List of speakers announced for Charlie Kirk's memorial service in Glendale
Democrat Katie Hobbs reportedly taps Republican John Giles as her Lt. Gov. running mate
Kris Mayes says Katie Hobbs pay-to-play probe is ‘near the end,’ expects results before election
Gov. Katie Hobbs would consider sharing data with federal government to fight healthcare fraud
Comments
51 Comments
You're probably replying to Dr. Death, he blocked me, too many facts I guess...Of course this will be called "fake news".
"The federal investigation into the assassination of conservative activist Charlie Kirk has yet to find a link between the alleged shooter, 22-year-old Tyler Robinson, and left-wing groups on which President Donald Trump and his administration have pledged to crack down after the killing, three sources familiar with the probe told NBC News."
For the record, I do think FCC Chair Carr was walking too close to the line with his 'threats'. However, I think you, I -- and most serious broadcasters -- think that, today, the industry has little regard for (or even understanding of) what, 'the public interest, need and convenience' even means. And that is a problem.
Threats from the government on any level are out of line. However they do exist at the margins. And that is a good thing. We want the FAA, the FTC, and myriad others to have brightly colored lines for the regulated to know when they are operating within, or outside, the lines. The regulated side of the equation should also want clarity.
Say what you will vis-a-vis Kimmel, but he clearly placed the onus of guilt on MAGA Republicans while in all likelihood knowing it was a lie. This is dis/mis-information at best and an illegal political donation at worst. Ironically, he could have reframed his joke if he had first just checked with ABC News on the status of the story at the moment. If he had said 'if' no one would be having this discussion.
You America hating leftists ALWAYS try to change topics when exposed in your lies.