ADVERTISEMENT

UNCATEGORIZED

Scottsdale company’s free body camera offer leaves police departments little choice

Thanks to Scottsdale-based Axon for eliminating one of the few excuses that police departments are giving to not try out body camera technology.

(AP Photo/Damian Dovarganes, File)...

(AP Photo/Damian Dovarganes, File)

(AP Photo/Damian Dovarganes, File)

I don’t think it’s common knowledge to most of the nation that Scottsdale-based Taser is one of the biggest players in the police body camera game.

The company made some major headlines last week when it announced it was changing its name to Axon, which happens to be the name of their body cams. It’s a good move considering that the word Taser is used almost exclusively when discussing any electric shocking self-defense tool, just like Kleenex is used for any tissue that is needed to blow your nose.

ADVERTISEMENT

But the biggest headlines came from the bold move of offering free body cams to any police departments that aren’t already on board with the technology.

It’s an offer for use of a body camera — about $400 — and one year of the company’s website and data storage, which costs between $15 and $90 per month.

Of course, once they agree to keep the hardware and technology, Axon gets paid.

It’s a page out of the drug dealer’s playbook: just a taste. But in this case, it’s for the greater good.

I think that this is a great idea. Don’t take my word for it. How about the head of the Arizona Department of Public Safety Frank Milstead? He joined Bruce St. James and Pamela Hughes last week to show his unwavering support for body cameras.

He said he has a good reason for supporting the devices: statistics.

Time and time again, body camera video shows that the police officer was conducting himself or herself properly and doing the right things while being accused of doing the wrong things. Vindication.

Which leads me to a somewhat sobering question: Why would a police officer not want a body camera? Why would a police officer not want someone to record a traffic stop, an altercation a domestic violence call?

I always tell my kids there’s no reason to hide if you’re not doing anything wrong.

It looks like body cams are here to stay. There is going to be a learning curve as well as time for complete adoption, but the ball is definitely rolling.

Thanks to our very own Axon for eliminating one of the few excuses that police departments are giving to not try this technology.

Mike Russell is KTAR's resident outdoorsman. His passion for the outdoors is the engine behind KTAR's hit show Get Outdoors with Mike Russell. Get Outdoors focuses on the world of hunting, fishing, camping and conservation. Mike's special features,… Read more

Comments

3 Comments

1969 Road Runner
1969 Road Runner 9 years ago

It's like buying a new $40 HP printer and then needing $80 ink refills for it. ;-)

J
John S 9 years ago

Cameras are cheap. It's paying for the storage for the video that costs all the money. Police Departments can get one-time grants for equipment, but rarely get grants for on-going support or employees to manage that data. Google "

For police body cameras, big costs loom in storage" for more info.

richard
richard 9 years ago

Bingo. The largest costs with cameras are: storage, archival and editing of proprietary software. Axon will make back the costs of the equipment in the first year of the storage contract.