Supt. Tom Horne says he might seek extra requirement from Arizona’s ESA vendors
Arizona's superintendent of public instruction said he might ask the Legislature to change one requirement for certain ESA vendors.
Arizona's superintendent of public instruction said he might ask the Arizona Legislature to change one requirement for certain ESA vendors. (Unsplash photo)
(Unsplash photo)
PHOENIX – Arizona Superintendent of Public Instruction Tom Horne said Monday the way vendors for the state’s school voucher program are vetted could be improved by requiring a more complete security check.
Arizona’s ESA (Empowerment Scholarship Account) program allows parents to spend tax money that otherwise would have been used on their child’s public school for private education or homeschooling. The program’s vendors are people or businesses that offer learning or extracurricular instruction in exchange for ESA funds. Nearly 100,000 students are enrolled in the program for the current school year.
ESA vendors provide a variety of services, from tutoring to piano lessons. The ESA handbook includes a list of approved services, although other services can be included if the vendor registers with the Arizona Department of Education.
Horne said the registration process isn’t difficult as long as the vendors provide the correct paperwork and pass a background check.
“Therapists would have to show a license, paraprofessionals would have to show that they passed the paraprofessional test, or they have 60 hours of instruction. Professionals would have to show credentials, and tutors would have to show a high school diploma. … If they’re a school they have to show that they teach the five subjects required by the Legislature. That’s reading, grammar, math, science and social studies,” he explained.
What could be changed about Arizona’s ESA vendor process?
Horne added he hasn’t faced many obstacles from vendors or parents related to the process, with the only complaints coming from parents wanting vendors to be required to submit their fingerprints.
“The legislators required teachers in the public schools to have a fingerprint card. But when they passed the ESA statute, they didn’t require that. … I’ve been thinking about maybe discussing with my executive team whether we should support a bill to require fingerprint cards for those that would engage personally with students,” he said.
How does ESA vendor program work in Arizona?
The ESA program and the vendor system operate through ClassWallet, a digital wallet where the Arizona Department of Education can transfer money to individual accounts. From there, the parents can use that money to purchase supplies or transfer money to a school or registered vendor on the website.
Cameron Krantzman is a newly registered ESA vendor who offers his own curriculum and tutoring services. He said the process to become a registered vendor was simple.
“They have a website, you go online, and there’s just a few documents that you submit. I’ve got a fingerprint clearance card. I’ve got a few subject matter tests. … Basically, they asked for your credentials,” he said.
Funding for this journalism is made possible by the Arizona Local News Foundation.






Comments
39 Comments
But ESA DOES take money away from public schools. ESA won’t pay the full fare for private school, so if parents want to send them they’ll still need to pony up additional money. That’s not an option for poor parents. Which means only people who can afford it benefit from this program. That’s unfair, and it harms the kids who remain in public school.
I’m opposed to it on principle, which I’ve already described.
You are in favor of it. So I ask you — are you still in favor of it if it produces rampant fraud?
Your question wasn’t should ESA be shut down because of rampant fraud, you specifically stated those fraud allegations were nonsense. As you discovered, they aren’t. And with Horne stating he lacks the manpower for adequate fraud oversight, we don’t know right now how egregious and widespread the fraud is.
So at the very least instead of denying fraud claims and assuming ESA is a good value for the taxpayer money, you should be demanding closer oversight. The half-truth angle is just a smokescreen to hide behind while you move the goalposts.