Lawsuit: “Fatigue” over Breonna Taylor case favors police
Jun 9, 2022, 12:28 PM | Updated: 12:48 pm
LOUISVILLE, Ky. (AP) — An attorney for the neighbors of Breonna Taylor who dodged police bullets in their apartment is asking a judge to move their civil lawsuit out of Louisville because “fatigue” over the Taylor case could sway a jury in favor of the police.
The change of venue motion says “it’s entirely possible potential jurors are fatigued by the entire Breonna Taylor tragedy ” and Taylor’s “ghost haunts any legal proceeding in Louisville.”
The lawsuit, now in federal court, was filed in 2020 by Cody Etherton and Chelsey Napper, who recently testified at a trial against former Louisville Detective Brett Hankison, who fired through Taylor’s apartment and into theirs. Taylor, a 26-year-old Black woman, was shot to death during the raid by officers who used a search warrant to knock down her door on March 13, 2020.
The argument for a location change is novel because Hankison had also pushed for a new venue ahead of his trial, over fear that a jury pool in Louisville would be biased against police. In their lawsuit, Etherton and Napper’s attorney, Jeff Sexton, says it’s the opposite — potential jurors in Louisville may now have a bias that favors police.
Etherton and Napper “have no recourse but to express to this court their concern about the very real possibility of community bias against their case because of Breonna Taylor fatigue within the Louisville community and the victimization of LMPD and its officers by some national and local media outlets and politicians,” according to the motion filed in March in U.S. District Court in Louisville.
The motion argues that the exoneration of Hankison by a jury in March “laid bare the potential existence of bias” against Napper and Etherton’s case. Hankison was fired after the Taylor incident for shooting blindly into Taylor’s apartment.
It says the trial’s evidence — including testimony from Etherton and Napper — was “overwhelmingly against Hankison insofar as the Kentucky criminal law defining wanton endangerment is written.” The jury found him not guilty after deliberating for about three hours.
The suit names Hankison and former officers John Mattingly and Myles Cosgrove, along with other officers and the city of Louisville. A response to the motion filed by lawyers for those defendants opposed moving the case out of Louisville, arguing that it’s too early to tell if there’s any bias and that Sexton’s claims are not based on any evidence. They also said moving the case would be a major inconvenience to witnesses who live in Louisville.
A judge has not ruled on the change of venue motion. Sexton said he is working on amending the lawsuit with under oath testimony from the Hankison trial. He said he has to file the updated suit by the end of this month.
After police knocked down Taylor’s door and Taylor’s boyfriend fired a shot at officers, Hankison fired shots that went through Taylor’s apartment and into her neighbor’s unit. Etherton said one bullet narrowly missed him in a hallway.
Copyright © The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
