Legally Speaking: Next gay rights battle in Arizona to focus on children, adoption

Jun 26, 2015, 2:54 PM | Updated: 4:04 pm
LISTEN: Monica Lindstrom

What does the Supreme Court’s decision mean for Arizona?

Arizona legalized same-sex marriage on Oct. 17, 2014. As such, the SCOTUS decision really just cements the validity of Arizona’s decision.

The more important question is what happens from here. There are several issues that the Arizona courts, legislators and attorneys will have to wade through.

The first issue is child custody and visitation issues.

Let’s say a same sex couple has a child and decides to divorce. One parent is the biological parent and the other is not. If both of their names are on the birth certificate the procedure will be much easier and akin to heterosexual couples.

However, if both names are not on the birth certificate it will get a bit messier. The non-biological parent can stand in the shoes of a parent (in loco parentis) and fight for visitation and for custody. The non-biological parent will have a higher burden to prove to the court that they have the right to get visitation and custody. The biological parent has a Constitutional right to raise their child but a non-biological parent does not.

This issue exists at times for heterosexual couples but will exist almost every time for same-sex couples. It will be interesting to see how Arizona sorts these issues out.

A second issue is adoptions.

Let’s change the hypothetical to a same-sex couple who wants to adopt a child. Several months ago Maricopa County Attorney Bill Montgomery came out and stated his interpretation of Arizona law is that his office has no legal responsibility to assist in same-sex adoptions though his office will continue to assist in heterosexual adoptions.

It will be interesting to see if Montgomery changes his stance in light of the landmark decision.

The third issue is child support. Take the hypothetical that the same-sex couple is married and has a child.

The non-biological parent is not on the birth certificate but helped raise the child. Will they have to pay child support? No.

So, we could see the laws change to deal with this issue as well.

Bottom line, Arizona was actually ahead of other parts of the country regarding same-sex marriages, however, our legislators were not.

There are things that will need to be changed in Arizona to deal with the implications of today’s decision but they will not happen overnight. Attorneys will have to fight over the issues in court and the people will have to force the legislators to act.

It won’t be a quick process but at least Arizona has a head start.

Monica Lindstrom

(AP Photo/Jose Luis Magana)...
Monica Lindstrom

Legally Speaking: It will come down to the states, not Supreme Court, to rule on abortion legality

The issue of whether an abortion will be legal and any rules regarding it will revert back to the states, not the Supreme Court, for each of them to decide on their own, writes Monica Lindstrom.
25 days ago
Arizona State Courts Building (Arizona Governor's Office Photo)...
Monica Lindstrom

Legally Speaking: Brnovich appeal to Arizona Supreme Court makes sense

KTAR legal analyst Monica Lindstrom thinks it's a good move by Attorney General Mark Brnovich to petition the Arizona Supreme Court to hear his appeal in a case about laws that were ruled unconstitutional.
8 months ago
(File Photo by Matthew Hatcher/Getty Images)...
Monica Lindstrom

Legally Speaking: Why judge rejected Arizona ban on mask mandates

KTAR legal expert Monica Lindstrom explains the reasons behind a judge's decision to strike down Arizona's ban on face mask mandates.
8 months ago
(Facebook File Photo/Phoenix Police Department)...
Monica Lindstrom

Legally Speaking: Police may need to be part of Phoenix oversight office

Phoenix's requirement that no current or former law enforcement be part of a new police oversight office appears to be in direct conflict with recently signed Arizona laws, writes KTAR News legal expert Monica Lindstrom.
1 year ago
Monica Lindstrom

Legally Speaking: Arizona employees could be required to get virus vaccine

With coronavirus vaccines on the horizon, Arizona employers could require their employees to get the virus vaccine but there would be exceptions.
2 years ago
(AP Photo/Matt York)...
Monica Lindstrom

Legally Speaking: Maricopa County ballot lawsuit could have merit

KTAR legal expert Monica Lindstrom says the Maricopa County ballot lawsuit could have merit, whether it's for affecting ongoing races or correcting a procedural issue for the next election.
2 years ago

Sponsored Articles

Carla Berg, MHS, Deputy Director, Public Health Services, Arizona Department of Health Services

ADHS mobile program brings COVID-19 vaccines and boosters to Arizonans

The Arizona Department of Health Services and partner agencies are providing even more widespread availability by making COVID-19 vaccines available in neighborhoods through trusted community partners.
Dr. Richard Carmona

Have you gotten your booster shot?

Do you remember when you got your last COVID-19 vaccination? If it has been more than five months since you completed your primary vaccination series, it’s time for you to get your booster. You may be eligible even sooner depending which vaccine you received. If you are over the age of 50 and received your […]
By Dr. Richard Carmona

Now’s a great time to receive your COVID-19 vaccine

If you haven’t received a COVID-19 vaccine yet, now’s the time to join many other of your fellow Arizonans who are doing so right now. No one will criticize you; there is no shame. In fact, you’ll be welcomed with smiles and open arms!
Legally Speaking: Next gay rights battle in Arizona to focus on children, adoption