Arizona architects group opposes U.S.-Mexico border wall spending
Feb 5, 2018, 5:32 PM
In this Oct. 19, 2017 file photo, crews work on a border wall prototypes near the border with Tijuana, Mexico, in San Diego. A U.S. official says recent testing of prototypes of President Donald Trump's proposed wall with Mexico found their heights should stop border crossers. U.S. tactical teams spent three weeks trying to breach and scale the models in San Diego. An official with direct knowledge of the results said they point to see-through steel barriers topped by concrete as the best design. The official spoke to The Associated Press on condition of anonymity because the information is not authorized for release. (AP Photo/Gregory Bull, File)
(AP Photo/Gregory Bull, File)
PHOENIX — A group of architects in Arizona said they believe it would not be wise to spend billions of dollars on a border wall as President Donald Trump is proposing.
The Arizona chapter of the American Institute of Architects recently passed a resolution asking Arizona’s congressional leaders to “seriously consider alternatives to an enhanced border wall between the U.S. and Mexico.” The group stated more money should be invested in infrastructure and other community projects instead of the border wall.
“Such investments would stimulate our economy more broadly than construction of a wall while providing real benefits to citizens in all fifty states,” the resolution stated.
In the resolution, the group also expressed concerns about the effectiveness of building a border wall, the environmental impact it would have and its cost to U.S. citizens.
The AIA chapters in California, New Mexico, and Texas all passed similar resolutions last month.
Robert Miller, president of AIA Arizona, said he got the idea of having the AIA border states approve their own resolutions last summer. He said he felt that as AIA members, they had an “ethical obligation” to comment on the border wall.
Last month, the White House unveiled an immigration proposal to replace the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program, which is set to expire March 5. The proposal included $25 billion to build a wall along the U.S.-Mexico border and a path to citizenship for up to 1.8 million young immigrants brought to the U.S. as children.
Miller said the Trump administration’s proposal to spend $25 billion on a border wall doesn’t seem like “a very wise expenditure” to make.
“There’s a whole host of real serious issues that face our citizens,” Miller said. “We just feel like the investment of this much money in a border wall is probably not going to be as good for the citizens of our country as investing in these other issues that are really hitting us hard.”
He said the money should be spent on other projects, including improving the country’s power grid and infrastructure.
