Birth control pioneer says fight had personal cost
Apr 9, 2012, 8:27 PM
Associated Press
CAMBRIDGE, Mass. (AP) – Taunts of “baby killer” and “butcher” still echo in Bill Baird’s ears, nearly five decades after he began fighting for birth control and abortion rights.
Now 79, the Massachusetts man says a Georgetown University law student’s recent verbal bashing on a national radio show is evidence that rights he equates with liberty and equality are in jeopardy.
“There will always be those who will try to deny us our freedoms,” Baird wrote in a letter to student Sandra Fluke, who testified to Congress about birth control. “As you have seen, it takes eternal vigilance to fight against those forces.”
Baird’s own fight started grabbing headlines around April 1967.
Vice squad cops arrested him after he gave contraceptive foam to a student during a Boston University lecture. He left the lecture in handcuffs, an arrest he spoke about last week as he marked the 45th anniversary of it.
Baird told about a dozen Democrats inside a stately home across the Charles River how Boston police helped advance his plan that day _ how giving contraception to an unmarried 19-year-old coed set up a constitutional challenge that propelled his case to the U.S. Supreme Court. It led to the court’s 1972 decision that gave unmarried people the same rights to birth control as married people.
But he also described how activism came at a personal price. Baird said it cost him a marriage and the trust of most of his children. It also left him with little income.
The lecturer who once netted $3,000 a speech said he poured the money into court cases, and running clinics that gave abortions to poor women.
Baird said he dodged bullets. Survived a firebombing at one of his suburban New York abortion clinics. Endured death threats.
“My mail runs a hundred to one: people praying for my death,” he said.
In 1979, his name was on a different Supreme Court decision that gave minors the right to abortions without parental consent.
As a recent cancer survivor, Baird thinks about his mortality. He fears that when he’s gone, his life’s work will be forgotten.
___
Baird says some people also have called him the devil because of his pro-abortion rights work.
His crusade started in 1963, when a woman who tried to give herself an abortion with a coat hanger died in his arms in a New York City hospital. He was clinical director for a contraception company at the time.
Baird says he opened the country’s first abortion counseling center a year later. The facility on Long Island, N.Y., referred women to physicians who would perform then-illegal abortions. Later, Baird operated two clinics on Long Island and another in Boston where women could go for legal abortions.
He often pitted himself against Catholic Church leaders who preached an anti-abortion message.
In 1979, he sued to try to stop a public church service by Pope John Paul II in Boston. In 1985, a Catholic bishop led 3,000 people in a protest at one of Baird’s New York clinics.
Baird claims some feminists and pro-abortion rights forces have tried to discredit him or downplay his contributions.
“There were very few men who came out and championed the women’s movement,” said Joyce Berkman, a history professor at University of Massachusetts Amherst. “And to have him champion their sexuality was suspicious.”
Baird totes around a portfolio of old press clippings, meant to convince listeners that the things he talks about really happened. He talks frequently of his arrests in five states. He also likes to display a copy of a pamphlet he says shows that unlike him, Planned Parenthood opposed abortion in the early 1960s.
But both supporters and opponents say Baird already has a place in history.
The Rev. Frank Pavone, who heads the anti-abortion organization Priests for Life, said he and Baird became friends after years of meeting at Right to Life conventions. Baird pickets the events.
“If you can break the law peacefully to advance a cause, both he and I believe in that,” Pavone said.
Officials from Planned Parenthood Federation of America in New York declined an interview request, but they said in a statement that Baird’s 1972 Supreme Court win was “a cultural landmark that has impacted generations of Americans.”
Massachusetts lawyer Thomas Eisenstadt called Baird a “trailblazer.” He is the man whose name is on the other side of the 1972 decision, known as Eisenstadt vs. Baird.
Then Suffolk County sheriff, Eisenstadt was Baird’s jailer when the activist spent 36 days in Boston’s old Charles Street Jail after the conviction that followed his Boston University arrest. He said Baird had a knack for attracting publicity.
“As he was leaving the jail he said: `Stick with me sheriff. You’ll get a lot of TV coverage.'”
___
A couple of hours before his Cambridge lecture last week, Baird went back to the old Charles Street Jail. The once-squalid facility reopened as a luxury hotel in 2007.
Baird said his memories of rats and lice, of a blood-stained mattress, of screams echoing among the granite cells, still unnerve him.
He posed for photos by the bars of an old cell, when a stranger who walked by tried to joke with him _ before Baird quipped he’d actually once been an inmate.
“Wow,” the man said then, “there’s a prisoner here.”
Later, Baird’s words left an impression with the clot of Democrats who heard him talk.
“He’s so right … We forget history and what people like Mr. Baird have accomplished,” Cambridge resident John Roughan said.
But Baird said he’s determined to make sure what he fought for isn’t lost.
“I will never give up,” he told his audience. “I believe that women and women alone must be free to make these choices.”
There were no handcuffs this time when his lecture ended.
(Copyright 2012 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.)
