WASHINGTON — The Center for Biological Diversity this week petitioned the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service to work to return grizzly bears to the Grand Canyon, the Gila/Mogollon complex and other areas of the Southwest.
The petition cited 110,000 square miles of potential bear habitat — in Arizona, New Mexico, the Sierra Nevada in California and Utah’s Uinta Mountains — that could allow the introduction of up to 4,000 grizzly bears in the West.
“This animal is very much revered,” said Noah Greenwald, the center’s endangered species director. “They are an iconic symbol of wilderness and our past.”
At least one critic called the plan a waste of taxpayer dollars for a proposal that is “playing God.”
But Greenwald said the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service needs to revise its 1993 grizzly bear recovery plan, which he said is outdated.
Gavin Shire, a Fish and Wildlife Service spokesman, would only say that the agency has received the center’s petition and is reviewing its content.
Greenwald said he expects to hear back from the agency within six months, but said that the overall process of reintroducing bears would be an ongoing one that could take years.
Greenwald said that fewer than than 2,000 grizzly bears exist today and they are confined to Montana, Idaho, Wyoming and Washington — about 4 percent of their historic range.
Reintroducing grizzlies to the greater Southwest would help increase the population of the threatened species. But it would also help regulate prey population and maintain the health of deer and elk herds, he said.
“By doing that they (grizzlies) benefit a lot of other species,” Greenwald said.
He said the areas cited in the petition are mostly uninhabited, with few roads.
“I think the Gila/Mogollon area is one of the largest areas where there aren’t currently bears, but could be,” he said.
But Patrick Bray, executive vice president of the Arizona Cattle Growers’ Association, does not see many positives to the center’s petition.
Bray said reintroducing bears to Arizona would hurt the livestock industry, especially for ranchers near the Arizona and New Mexico border.
He also said the recovery plan would be a waste of taxpayer dollars, and called the center’s action a “game” to “keep man off public lands.”
“Humans should be really careful in playing God with these things,” Bray said. “What is going to happen to the elk herd or other wildlife? Why is it that we need to play this game?”
- Sunscreen facts that could save your life
- 6 energy saving hacks for your home
- 5 tips for choosing a company to end your timeshare
- Water tips to save money, help save the Earth
- 5 of the most adored gentlemen in professional sports today
- The real danger of sitting at your desk
- Most surprising NBA playoff performances of the last 40 years
- 11 classic baseball movies you must see again
- Finally getting rid of fat: 3 methods that actually work
- 4 reasons cancer survivors should focus on food
- 5 spring cleaning spots everyone forgets
- 5 reasons to look forward to watching the D-backs this season
- Common virus attributed to spike in head and neck cancers
- 5 signs it’s time to end your timeshare ownership
- 3 most overlooked ways to keep your home healthy
- 6 ways the air in your home could be making you sick
- CrossFit dangers: 5 common injuries and how to deal with them
- Today's radiation treatments offer better success, fewer side effects
- Tips to make watching TV on the patio even better
- What really happens when you donate to a community college?
- Sun and skin cancer: Separating fact from fiction
- 5 critical lifestyle changes for a healthy colon
- What you need to know about Alzheimer's disease in Arizona
- Spring clean your windows like a pro with these 8 tips
- 7 films that should have won best-picture Oscars
- New plumbing technology saves money and improves your home
- Survey shows Arizona CFOs optimistic about 2016
- How chronic pain can affect your love life
- 5 potential warning signs about your child's development