Certain types of cancer are linked to areas with high poverty, according to a new study, and many of those types of cancer are more lethal than those found in wealthier areas.
Published Tuesday in the journal Cancer, researchers studied nearly 3 million tumors diagnosed between 2005 and 2009 from 16 states and found that of 39 cancers, 32 showed “a significant association with poverty,” the report says.
While there is no link between poverty and new cancers, areas where poverty is most prevalent are strongly associated with laryngeal, cervical, penile and liver cancer. In wealthier areas, skin and thyroid cancers are more common.
“The cancers more associated with poverty have lower incidence and higher mortality, and those associated with wealth have higher incidence and lower mortality. When it comes to cancer, the poor are more likely to die of the disease while the affluent are more likely to die with the disease,” said the study's researcher, Francis Boscoe, in a statement.
One reason less lethal types of cancer are more common in the wealthy is because those types of cancer are “more likely to be picked up in individuals who have regular medical check-ups,” Al Jazeera reported.
“Wealthier communities are more engaged with the health care system and have more frequent screenings,” Boscoe told Al Jazeera.
Plus, “cancers associated with behavioral risk factors such as tobacco, alcohol and poor diet were associated with higher levels of poverty. These include HPV- and tobacco-associated cancers such as cervix, oral, lung, esophagus and liver,” Al Jazeera reported.
While research has been done on cancer across racial and ethnic disparities, (one study shows that black women are 40 percent more likely to die from breast cancer than white women), little research has been focused linking socioeconomic status and cancer, and “examining the role of race and ethnicity alone is limiting,” Boscoe told Al Jazeera.
Boscoe and her research team say “there is a shortage of studies looking at the association between socioeconomic status and cancer, partly because until now, public health data systems have rarely collected such information,” according to Medical News Today. But Boscoe is hopeful cancer registries in North America will start to track socioeconomic status.
- Affordable small home makeovers for Mother's Day
- Locals helping locals: 6 success stories you need to know about
- Sunscreen facts that could save your life
- 6 energy saving hacks for your home
- 5 tips for choosing a company to end your timeshare
- Overlooked water tips to save you money
- 5 of the most adored gentlemen in professional sports today
- The real danger of sitting at your desk
- Most surprising NBA playoff performances of the last 40 years
- 11 classic baseball movies you must see again
- Finally getting rid of fat: 3 methods that actually work
- 4 reasons cancer survivors should focus on food
- 5 spring cleaning spots everyone forgets
- 5 reasons to look forward to watching the D-backs this season
- Common virus attributed to spike in head and neck cancers
- 5 signs it’s time to end your timeshare ownership
- 3 most overlooked ways to keep your home healthy
- 6 ways the air in your home could be making you sick
- CrossFit dangers: 5 common injuries and how to deal with them
- Today's radiation treatments offer better success, fewer side effects
- Tips to make watching TV on the patio even better
- What really happens when you donate to a community college?
- Sun and skin cancer: Separating fact from fiction
- 5 critical lifestyle changes for a healthy colon
- What you need to know about Alzheimer's disease in Arizona
- Spring clean your windows like a pro with these 8 tips
- 7 films that should have won best-picture Oscars
- New plumbing technology saves money and improves your home
- Survey shows Arizona CFOs optimistic about 2016
- How chronic pain can affect your love life