Bonneville Phoenix Network
 KTAR News
 Arizona Sports
92.3 FM KTAR
Updated Feb 12, 2014 - 7:14 pm

Arizona AG Horne: I broke no campaign finance laws

PHOENIX — Arizona Attorney General Tom Horne said Wednesday he
“absolutely never” had illegal communications with the leader of an
independent campaign backing him during his 2010 election bid.

Horne was testifying during the third and final day of a hearing where he and
current aide Kathleen Winn are trying to fend off civil allegations of illegal
campaign coordination.

Under questioning by his attorney, Michael Kimerer, Horne repeatedly said he
broke no campaign laws.

“We absolutely never coordinated or violated any of the laws,” he said. “I
absolutely never did coordinate with Kathleen Winn.”

Horne said that while he did send an email to Winn urging her to raise another
$100,000 from a national Republican group, he made a legal distinction between
helping an independent committee raise funds and telling it how to spend the
money or helping it design an ad, for instance.

“You’re prohibited from communicating about the expenditures … but there’s
no prohibition about talking about the money, the contributions,” Horne said.

But that email, besides containing a request for Winn to raise more money, also
contained polling and strategy information, and she passed that on to her
campaign consultant.

Judge Tammy Eigenheer of the Arizona Office of Administrative Hearings is
overseeing the case, but it will be nearly two months at best before she issues
a ruling. First, lawyers for both sides will file written closing arguments.

Her ruling will likely not be the end of the case, however, because Yavapai
County Attorney Sheila Polk can accept or reject her findings and impose
sanctions herself. She determined in October that Horne violated the law and
must repay $400,000 to donors and pay three times that amount in fines.

Horne and Winn could appeal any decision, dragging any final conclusion into
the election season, where Horne faces a challenger in August’s Republican
primary as he seeks a second term. If he wins the primary, he’ll likely face the
same Democrat he narrowly defeated in 2010, Felecia Rotellini, a former
prosecutor and bank regulator.

Horne and Winn are accused of working together on a campaign ad targeting
Rotellini that was paid for by an independent group Winn was running, Business
Leaders for Arizona. That “coordination” is illegal in Arizona.

Winn testified Wednesday that she had become friends with Horne during the
primary campaign but told him she would stop work on his official campaign to
instead help raise money and spend it independently in the general election.

Winn said when she told Horne about her plans in early October 2010, he advised
her on campaign finance laws dealing with outside groups and referred her to a
lawyer, who gave her advice on what she was allowed to do.

She acknowledged speaking with Horne regularly, but not about her campaign
efforts. Prosecutors believe that there is evidence on specific days of illegal
coordination, citing calls with Horne on a day when an ad was finalized with a
political consultant. Winn says she and Horne only spoke about a real estate
transaction that day, which is not illegal.

“I even asked my attorney if I could talk to Tom Horne, and I could talk to
Tom Horne, just not about this campaign,” Winn said under questioning from her
lawyer, Timothy La Sota.

Yavapai County prosecutors are trying to show that Winn consulted with Horne
before giving final approval for the ad targeting Rotellini. They point to a
series of emails and phone records showing Horne communicated with Winn as she
was giving final approval for an ad campaign overseen by consultant Brian
Murray. They acknowledge the evidence against the pair is purely circumstantial.

An FBI agent this week testified that the emails and cellphone records show
Horne talked to Winn while she worked with a campaign consultant about an ad.

Both denied they ever discussed campaign strategy or the content of the TV ad.

“Tom was not involved in the process of this ad,” she told Deputy County
Attorney Jack Fields. “I don’t know how many different ways I can say this.”

But lawyers for Horne and Winn scored major points Tuesday when a witness, Greg
Tatham, disputed FBI agent Brian Grehoski’s assertion that Tatham said Winn
wasn’t involved in the real estate deal with Horne.

Tatham, whose wife is a former Horne spokeswoman, had tape-recorded two calls
with the agent and his partner, and Winn was mentioned in neither.

Grehoski returned to the stand Wednesday and said there was an additional phone
call where Tatham was asked about Winn’s involvement in the deal.

“In my opinion he is either lying to you or he doesn’t recall it too well,”
Grehoski said.

He was met with skepticism from defense attorneys.

Defense attorneys say Winn, who used to work in real estate, and Horne did
discuss a real estate deal during the period under investigation. But Grehoski
said none of the emails he has reviewed show they were discussing real estate.


comments powered by Disqus