PHOENIX — The Arizona Legislature took its first step Tuesday toward
providing $6.8 million to allow the state’s child welfare agency to hire 192 new
workers right away, a key part of Gov. Jan Brewer’s effort to remake the agency.
But sharp questioning by Senate Appropriations Committee members showed Brewer
isn’t going to be allowed to overhaul the agency without strong oversight.
Members of the committee questioned her choice to head a remade Child
Protective Services agency, now called the Division of Child Safety and Family
Services, about how he intends to fill those positions, whether more outside
oversight is needed and whether more problems are yet to be uncovered.
Brewer pulled CPS from the Department of Economic Security earlier this month
in the wake of revelations about more than 6,500 uninvestigated child abuse and
neglect reports. The new agency’s director, Charles Flanagan, said he too has
been surprised at the problems he found within the agency.
“It has been shocking to me to see the things that happened that do not follow
the law and do not follow policy,” Flanagan said. “And one of those things is
the (uninvestigated) cases.”
An outspoken critic who has battled CPS as a foster parent, Sen. Rick Murphy,
R-Peoria, called the problems that have disclosed at the agency “the tip of the
“And I’m not comfortable giving (CPS) one more dime,” he said.
Murphy also pressed for outside oversight of the agency, and Flanagan said that
might be one of the recommendations he includes in a report he’s now preparing.
Brewer asked for the extra money for this budget year in addition to a $74
million request for the budget year that starts July 1. That request will pay
for a plan to remake Child Protective Services and beef up its resources to deal
with growing caseloads and revelations that thousands of cases went
The committee eventually approved the extra funding on an 8-0 vote. Senate Bill
1224 shifts $1.1 million in the current budget to the new agency and gives it
another $5.7 million. The bill now moves to the full Senate for consideration
after a routine review.
Brewer also wants $4.2 million for emergency child placement in group homes and
other settings and $5.4 million for family support services such as parenting
skill training and foster-care recruitment this budget year.
Senate President Andy Biggs said those requests aren’t likely to be taken up as
“In discussions with the executive, this was deemed to be the most pressing
issue,” Biggs said. “Some of the others might be able to be taken care of in
the normal budget process.”
In other special funding approved Tuesday:
_ The Arizona Independent Redistricting Commission was given nearly $1.4
million. The commission has been burning through cash defending Legislative and
Congressional maps approved in 2012 from court challenges.
One of those cases, a challenge by the Legislature of the commission’s right to
draw state district maps, was argued in federal court last week. Another,
brought by citizens including Biggs’ wife, challenges the congressional maps. A
full trial on that case was held last March by a three-judge panel, but the
federal judges have yet to rule.
“Constitutionally we are bound, in my opinion, to pay their attorney’s fees,
whether we like it or not,” Biggs said of Senate Bill 1220.
_ A $100,000 special appropriation to hire private lawyers to fight subpoenas
issued to current and former lawmakers about their communications concerning
2010’s Senate Bill 1070 also was approved. Senate Bill 1159 will pay to fight
requests for Legislative, personal and campaign correspondence from 21 House and
Senate members who supported Arizona’s tough immigration law. Biggs has called
the subpoenas a fishing expedition by the American Civil Liberties Union
designed to harass members who supported SB 1070.
Sen. Lynne Pancrazi, D-Yuma, joined other committee Democrats in voting against
the funding. “I think a better way to handle this would be to repeal SB 1070
and then this lawsuit would go away,” she said.
_ The committee also agreed to advance Senate Bill 1221, which would authorize
the Attorney General to defend against such subpoenas in the future.
Identical bills are making their way through the House, putting all four on the
fast track to the governor’s desk.