WASHINGTON – The federal government wants to target childhood obesity with new limits for calories, sugar, fat and sodium on snacks sold in the nation’s schools.
The Smart Snacks in School standards, announced last week by the U.S. Department of Agriculture, expand school nutrition standards for the first time to snacks, whether sold in the cafeteria, a vending machine or elsewhere.
Besides setting limits on fats, sugars and calories, the new rules would also limit portion sizes for drinks and snacks. Birthday parties, bake sales and school fundraisers would be exempt from the rules, which are scheduled to go into effect next July.
Most Arizona school officials welcomed the change, saying the state adopted similar nutrition standards for all school foods – including snacks – in 2006.
“Our schools are already ahead of the game,” said Mary Szafranski, deputy associate superintendent for health and nutrition services at the Arizona Department of Education, who said the department supports the new regulations “without a doubt.”
But others worried that there will not be enough time to study the impact of the new rules on students’ diets or to get the new food choices in place. And some local officials worried about the effect of tighter regulations on vending-machine sales, a source of revenue for some schools.
Diane Pratt-Heavner, spokeswoman for the School Nutrition Association, said she thinks schools will do their best to meet the standards, but worries about “the impact that eliminating some of the food options will have on school meal programs participation.”
The association, representing 55,000 school nutrition professionals in schools nationwide, is also concerned that schools might not be able to “provide alternative items that meet the new standard in time.”
“School meal programs are already in the midst of a sea of change as cafeterias work to meet new school breakfast and lunch standards and encourage students to try the healthier choices offered,” said association President Sandra Ford in a statement.
“Complex regulations can present unique challenges and unintended consequences when put into practice,” she said.
Neal McCluskey, an educational analyst at Cato Institute, said one of those consequences could be increasing schools’ financial burden for regulations that he said will not be effective.
“Just because they now stock vending machines with healthy options, it doesn’t mean kids are going to suddenly start eating a lot healthier,” McCluskey said. “Kids will probably throw away the nutritious food and find another way to get snacks, not from vending machines that sell things they don’t want.”
Szafranski disagreed, saying “a hungry child will eat the food that is offered to them.”
When any new food is introduced to a child, said Szafranski, “it may take a couple of times for the child to really start appreciate the taste for it, but I do believe that our children are really adaptable to the positive influence that this will have on them.”
But McCluskey argued that the impact will be “on school revenues and general disuse of the vending machines” and not on students.
Loretta Zullo, director of Mesa Unified School District’s food and nutrition department, said vending-machine sales have decreased in her district since the implementation of the Arizona Nutrition Standards in 2006.
“The dollar sales of vending machines are declining,” Zullo said, adding that they might continue to decline because of the higher standards.
But the Agriculture Department snack regulations note that only about 1.7 percent of “competitive food” revenue came from vending machine sales.
And that is another reason Szafranski backs the new rules. She said the rules will “foster healthy school environments, which should be maintained throughout their lives.”
“It will teach kids about healthful choices, it will teach them about what their body needs nutritiously to grow up to be active, productive, healthful adults,” Szafranski said.
Paradise Valley Unified School District nutrition director Kathy Glindmeier said she has seen a positive effect already under the Arizona standards.
“Kids are used to not having sugary drinks as much,” said Glindmeier, who noted that the most popular drink sold on campuses in the district now is bottled water.
“I think the new rule is important,” she said. “We’ve already made some changes and will continue to make the change we need to make.”
- 7 common ways to get sued by your employees
- Why it might be time to upgrade your toilet
- Arizona teachers are building a better future by using technology in the classroom
- How to make summer reading fun for the whole family
- How to find relief for chronic joint pain
- Can the NBA Lottery save the Suns?
- Skip Urgent Care: 5 ailments you can treat with telemedicine
- Skin Cancer in Arizona: Stats, facts and new immunotherapy drugs making strides
- Distracted walking injuries end up not so funny
- Scary situations: 5 quick tips before you let a contractor in your home
- Four ways telemedicine is changing the health care industry
- 5 mistakes homeowners make in the spring
- Three rivers run through it: Exploring Arizona's waterways
- Smart home basics: things you need to know to get started
- 5 Surprising things causing back pain
- Arizona agriculture is a $17.1B industry
- Timeline: Arizona's roots in brewing history
- 5 reasons to love the D-backs this season
- Tips for taking your home entertainment experience to the backyard
- Tech-related injuries your parents never experienced
- Workers comp: Signs your co-worker could be a fraud
- Who's the real founder of America's pastime?
- Epidemic rising? What you need to know about Alzheimer's in Arizona
- 5 unforgettable Wooden Award winners
- Family and hard work are keys to success of modern dairy farmers
- Genetic testing could hold answers for colon cancer survival
- Cold beers and baseball: A beer lover's guide to Spring Training
- Telecommuting: 5 tips to make it work for employers and employees
- See how top CFOs feel about economic growth in the Valley
- Migraine myths that keep patients from effective treatments