PHOENIX — Supporters of Gov. Jan Brewer’s performance-based education funding model for school districts and charter holders said concerns about the formula’s effects on schools in low-income areas don’t take into account the bigger picture.
“Are they completely unfounded concerns? No. But are they blown way out of proportion? Yes,” Dale Frost, Brewer’s education policy adviser, said in an interview.
Critics including the Arizona Education Association, the state’s largest teachers union, suggested that the model could hinder the improvement of low-performing schools. That’s because some of the funding would come from money reallocated from all districts and charter holders.
“I think that any time you talk about a funding model that takes away resources from a school that’s already having problems you’re not going to have a solution that actually works,” said Rep. Chad Campbell, D-Phoenix, the House minority leader.
The governor’s proposal is contained in SB 1444, authored by Sen. Kimberly Yee, R-Phoenix, which was awaiting action by the Senate Rules Committee after winning endorsements from the Education and Appropriations committees.
The bill calls for phasing in the performance-based education funding model for kindergarten through 12th grade over the next five years.
The formula used to calculate performance funding for each school district and charter school would be based on both achievement and improvement. Each component would be measured on a 200-point scale based on the A-F letter grades districts and charter schools already receive from the state Department of Education.
All schools and districts earning a letter grade of C or higher would qualify for achievement funding, while only those that improve on their previous year’s score would receive improvement funding.
Of the $56 million the governor’s budget allocates for performance funding, $38 million would be new funding and $18 million would reallocated from all districts and charter holders under a formula that works out to about $17 per student in the first year.
The maximum amount of performance funding per student would be $500 for achievement and $500 for improvement. In the first year, the amount would be capped at 20 percent of the total minus reallocated funds, for a maximum of about $180 per student.
A school that would qualify for neither achievement nor improvement funding would still be liable for the reallocation part of the equation. That money would be cut from the district or charter’s per-student funding.
Craig Barrett, chairman of the Arizona Ready Education Council, called the performance-funding model “a pretty symbolic effort” as a start for reform. In the first year of the program, the total amount of performance-based funding would constitute about 1 percent of a school district or charter school’s budget.
“It’s easy to craft lot of emotion about of this,” he said. “But it’s still a small percentage of the budget.”
But David Garcia, an associate professor in Arizona State University’s Mary Lou Fulton Teachers College, said the formula wouldn’t achieve the goal of funding based on performance. He said the structure of the funding model actually ties funding to student demographics.
His research, which looked at the correlation between the percentage of students on free and reduced lunch and expected performance funding, found a moderately strong relationship between the two variables. He said districts and charters serving low-income students and families will receive significantly less money than others.
“I think the idea here is you want to reward districts for what they do,” he said. “But what you’re doing is you’re penalizing districts for the kind of students they enroll.”
Garcia said his research, which used data from the largest school districts, found that those with less than 25 percent of the student population on free or reduced lunch would receive an average of $42 per pupil. Districts with greater than 75 percent of the student population on free or reduced lunch would receive an average of $18 per pupil.
“Those two extremes are really where there is an issue,” he said. “Our richest districts are going to get twice as much per pupil.”
A model created by the governor’s office used data from all districts and charter schools that would be eligible to receive performance funding. That found little to no correlation between free and reduced lunch and performance funding.
Campbell said there are better ways to improve education.
“I think a better formula is to just fund schools,” he said. “That’s the better formula.”
Jennifer Laredo, director of government relations for the Arizona School Boards Association, called the bill and funding model a work in progress. She said performance funding for schools wouldn’t be a cure-all for the education system but would be a powerful tool at the local level.
“The system just can’t be looked at as one size fits all that’s going to fix everything,” she told the Senate Education Committee. “It’s a tool in the toolbox of reform.”
Gov. Jan Brewer’s office has developed an online calculator to preview a school district or charter holder’s performance-based funding.
For instance, a school district that scores 130, a B, in 2012 and 145, an A, in 2013 would get $102.86 per student, which includes $48.87 for achievement and $71.25 for improvement and subtracts $17.26 reallocated to help pay for the program.
- Celebrating Fourth of July is much cooler in these AZ towns
- Top ten road trip bathrooms in America
- Six things causing a pain in your neck
- 5 things to make your summer move easier
- Three elements of a strong timeshare exit guarantee
- Stretches and exercises for carpal tunnel syndrome
- The best Major League ballparks have their own personality
- Comparing the best regular seasons: The '96 Bulls and '16 Warriors
- 3 Arizona road trips and the vehicles to get you there
- Colon cancer is preventable. Check these signs and symptoms to stay healthy.
- 6 of the biggest skin cancer myths
- Affordable small home makeover ideas
- Locals helping locals: 6 success stories you need to know about
- Sunscreen facts that could save your life
- 6 energy saving hacks for your home
- 5 tips for choosing a company to end your timeshare
- Overlooked water tips to save you money
- 5 of the most adored gentlemen in professional sports today
- The real danger of sitting at your desk
- Most surprising NBA playoff performances of the last 40 years
- 11 classic baseball movies you must see again
- Finally getting rid of fat: 3 methods that actually work
- 4 reasons cancer survivors should focus on food
- 5 spring cleaning spots everyone forgets
- 5 reasons to look forward to watching the D-backs this season
- Common virus attributed to spike in head and neck cancers
- 5 signs it’s time to end your timeshare ownership
- 3 most overlooked ways to keep your home healthy
- 6 ways the air in your home could be making you sick
- CrossFit dangers: 5 common injuries and how to deal with them