Bonneville Phoenix Network
 KTAR News
 Arizona Sports
92.3 FM KTAR
Updated Feb 22, 2013 - 5:30 pm

Loughner attorneys object to release of records

TUCSON, Ariz. — Lawyers for the man who carried out the Tucson shooting
rampage that wounded former U.S. Rep. Gabrielle Giffords two years ago objected
Friday to the release of investigative materials in the case.

Judy Clarke, a California-based attorney for Jared Lee Loughner, urged U.S.
District Judge Larry Burns to recognize “privacy interests of the witnesses and
victims, including the defendant’s family.”

Clarke added that “records of this nature are not typically publicly available
in a federal criminal action” and “a driving concern for federal oversight in
such cases is the need to protect defendants prosecuted for such sensational
crimes from harm or potential public backlash.”

However, Clarke said the “question to lift the protective order” was up to

Loughner was sentenced in November to seven consecutive life sentences, plus
140 years, for the shootings that killed six people and wounded 13, including
Giffords, at an event outside a Tucson grocery store.

Arizona’s chief federal judge and a 9-year-old girl were among those killed in
the rampage on Jan. 8, 2011. Giffords was left partially blind with a paralyzed
right arm and brain injury. She resigned from Congress last year.

Loughner, 24, pleaded guilty to 19 federal charges and was transported back to
a federal prison medical facility in Springfield, Mo., where he has been treated
for schizophrenia.

Star Publishing Company, publisher of the Arizona Daily Star newspaper in
Tucson, is seeking the dissolution of a protective order keeping the Pima County
sheriff from releasing the material. The protective order was to ensure
Loughner’s right to a fair trial.

Burns allowed Star Publishing to intervene in a case seeking the release of
investigate materials last week and said “the court is inclined to agree…
that the protective order should be vacated.”

Federal prosecutors said Wednesday that they don’t oppose Burn’s decision, but
the judge gave all parties in the case until Friday to reply.

There has been no reply yet from the sheriff’s department.

Burns said he would schedule a hearing in the matter if necessary.


comments powered by Disqus