NEW ORLEANS (AP) – BP on Tuesday asked an appeals court to review a ruling upholding a multibillion-dollar settlement to compensate victims of the company’s 2010 oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico.
In a filing with the full 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, BP argued that a divided three-judge panel from the court erred earlier this month when it affirmed a U.S. district judge’s approval of the company’s settlement with a team of private plaintiffs’ lawyers. The New Orleans-based appeals court has 14 active judges and eight senior judges who also hear cases.
BP argued that the panel’s Jan. 10 majority decision will force the company to pay hundreds of millions of dollars to businesses that weren’t harmed by the massive spill.
The company’s lawyers argue that the 5th Circuit panel shouldn’t have upheld U.S. District Judge Carl Barbier’s December 2012 certification of a class of “vast numbers of claimants … without regard to whether the class has been defined to include numerous members with no colorable claims against the defendants.”
“If the panel’s decision is permitted to stand, it will work a revolution in class-action law in this Circuit, permitting the certification of classes that cannot be certified anywhere else in the country,” BP attorneys wrote.
Plaintiffs’ lawyers have said BP simply undervalued the settlement and underestimated how many claimants would be eligible for payments. In a letter to the 5th Circuit dated Monday, plaintiffs’ attorneys said BP’s current position is that “some unknown and subjective standard” should be used to define class membership.
BP has argued that Barbier and court-appointed claims administrator Patrick Juneau have misinterpreted settlement terms in ways that would force the company to pay for billions of dollars in inflated or bogus claims by businesses. During a hearing in November, a BP lawyer argued that Barbier’s approval of the deal shouldn’t stand unless the company ultimately prevails in its ongoing dispute over business payments.
In October, a different 5th Circuit panel threw out Barbier’s rulings on the dispute over business payments and ordered him to change the calculation of some damages. Last month, Barbier rejected BP’s argument that the settlement shouldn’t compensate businesses if they can’t directly trace their losses to the spill.
(Copyright 2014 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.)
- Affordable small home makeovers for Mother's Day
- Locals helping locals: 6 success stories you need to know about
- Sunscreen facts that could save your life
- 6 energy saving hacks for your home
- 5 tips for choosing a company to end your timeshare
- Overlooked water tips to save you money
- 5 of the most adored gentlemen in professional sports today
- The real danger of sitting at your desk
- Most surprising NBA playoff performances of the last 40 years
- 11 classic baseball movies you must see again
- Finally getting rid of fat: 3 methods that actually work
- 4 reasons cancer survivors should focus on food
- 5 spring cleaning spots everyone forgets
- 5 reasons to look forward to watching the D-backs this season
- Common virus attributed to spike in head and neck cancers
- 5 signs it’s time to end your timeshare ownership
- 3 most overlooked ways to keep your home healthy
- 6 ways the air in your home could be making you sick
- CrossFit dangers: 5 common injuries and how to deal with them
- Today's radiation treatments offer better success, fewer side effects
- Tips to make watching TV on the patio even better
- What really happens when you donate to a community college?
- Sun and skin cancer: Separating fact from fiction
- 5 critical lifestyle changes for a healthy colon
- What you need to know about Alzheimer's disease in Arizona
- Spring clean your windows like a pro with these 8 tips
- 7 films that should have won best-picture Oscars
- New plumbing technology saves money and improves your home
- Survey shows Arizona CFOs optimistic about 2016
- How chronic pain can affect your love life