Login

Register | Forgot Your Password? | Close
U.S. Sen. Orrin Hatch addresses the Utah Republican Party's annual organizing convention Saturday, May 18, 2013, in Sandy, Utah. Hatch says staffers at the Internal Revenue Service, which recently apologized for unfairly targeting tea party groups, "are either deliberately incompetent or they are evil." Hatch mentioned the IRS scandal while addressing thousands of fellow Republicans in Sandy on Saturday for the state party's annual organizing convention. Hatch says the IRS scandal is more concerning than almost anything else he's seen in the 36 years he's been in the U.S. Senate. (AP Photo/Rick Bowmer)

WASHINGTON (AP) - The Senate Judiciary Committee is aiming this week to pass a landmark immigration bill to secure the border and offer citizenship to millions, setting up a high-stakes debate on the Senate floor.

First, the committee must resolve a few remaining disputes.

One involves amendments over high-skilled immigrant visas sought by the high-tech industry but opposed by labor unions. The bill as written increases the availability of these visas, but includes restrictions aimed at ensuring U.S. workers get the first crack at jobs. Silicon Valley companies view some of the restrictions as too onerous and are lobbying to soften them.

Sen. Orrin Hatch, R-Utah, seen as a swing vote on the committee, is on the side of the high-tech industry, while Sen. Dick Durbin, D-Ill., is championing the labor position. Lawmakers and lobbyists have been trying to find a compromise that could win Hatch's support for the overall bill without alienating Durbin, one of its authors.

There's also a disagreement over whether gay Americans should be given the right to sponsor their foreign-born spouses for green cards like straight Americans can. Gay rights groups are pressuring Judiciary Chairman Patrick Leahy, D-Vt., to offer an amendment allowing this, but Republican authors of the immigration bill insist that they'll abandon their support for their legislation if such a measure is included.

Both disputes were put off until last week as lawmakers negotiated behind the scenes and weighed their options. The three public work sessions the Judiciary Committee held over the last two weeks featured little suspense, as committee members waded through some of the 300 amendments that were filed to the bipartisan bill. The legislation seeks to dramatically remake the U.S. immigration system and allow tens of thousands of new high- and low-skilled workers into the country.

Committee members accepted a number of Republican-sought changes to the bill, including provisions tightening up border security. But majority Democrats and the two Republican committee members who helped write the legislation- Arizona Sen. Jeff Flake and South Carolina Sen. Lindsey Graham- fended off major changes, branded "poison pills," that could jeopardize the delicate compromises at its core.

This week, in addition to the high-tech and gay marriage disputes, amendments will focus on the crucial sections of the bill dealing with the 13-year path to citizenship the legislation offers the 11 million people in this country who are here illegally.

Democrats have the votes to ensure committee passage of the legislation by the end of the week, before Congress breaks for its Memorial Day recess. The outcome is less certain on the Senate floor, where Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., has promised the measure will be considered in June. Less certain still is the outcome in the GOP-controlled House, where Speaker John Boehner, R-Ohio, has not said publicly how or when he'll proceed with bringing immigration legislation to a vote.


(Copyright 2013 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.)

Associated Press,

share this story:
facebook

122 Comments   |   Join the conversation »
  • Add A Comment 
  • Abuse
    SurpriseMe wrote...
    encourage human smuggling
    to citizenship for illegal immigrants. that only encourages people to cross our borders the wrong way. in fact one could say it encourages human smuggling. What about the Legal Immigrant? every immigrant needs to become legal first and earn their citizenship. We have path to citizenship today, in fact thousands every year do it legally.
  • Abuse
    Steve wrote...
    1986 was the overhaul of all overhauls
    and our government ignored it right after it's passing. The worst violator since has been Obama who has flat out ignored the laws and Constitution.
  • Abuse
    Steve wrote...
    If you think Obamacare is bad now
    Just wait till millions more are added if amnesty is passed.
  • Abuse
    wrote...
    The
    politicians created the problem wih poor enforcement of existing immigration laws....now they want to be heroes fixing something that they caused.
  • Abuse
    wrote...
    We do not need reform
    We need enforcement.
  • Abuse
    Michoacan wrote...
    Republicans see the writing on the wall.
    Demonstrate a commitment to fixing deficiencies in the immigration system, or face extinction.,
  • Abuse
    yrreta wrote...
    "Now, with some Republicans chastened
    by the November elections which demonstrated the importance of Latino voters and their increasing commitment to Democrats, some in the GOP say this time will be different." Or in other words, this is about harvesting votes, not necessarily what's best for the Country, but what's best for political careers.
  • Abuse
    wrote...
    back assward and corrupt
    So we are now rewarding lawbreakers and penalizing the successful. The inmates really are running the insane asylum in DC.
  • Abuse
    Steve wrote...
    Votes over Principles
    The GOP takes a page from the Democrats.
  • Abuse
    Michoacan wrote...
    Ma wants to live in one of the communist
    countries where an individual's self interest is discouraged. Here in the U.S., Ma, self interest is what drives our economic engines. Throughout our history, it has been the labor and other social inputs of successive waves of immigrants that has lifted all boats. Still the case.