Login

Register | Forgot Your Password? | Close
People shout out against the Strengthen and Fortify Enforcement Act in the hall outside the House Judiciary Committee hearing on Capitol Hill in Washington, Tuesday, June 18, 2013. The committee in the Republican-led House is preparing to cast its first votes on immigration this year, on a tough enforcement-focused measure that Democrats and immigrant groups are protesting loudly. (AP Photo/Carolyn Kaster)

WASHINGTON (AP) - Supporters of a far-reaching immigration bill in the Senate see fresh momentum from a report by the Congressional Budget Office that says the measure would boost the economy and reduce federal deficits by billions of dollars.

Congress' nonpartisan scorekeeping agency said that the immigration bill would decrease federal red ink by $197 billion over a decade and $700 billion in the following 10 years as increased taxes paid to the government offset the cost of benefits for newly legal residents.

The White House said the report was "more proof that bipartisan commonsense immigration reform will be good for economic growth and deficit reduction."

On the Senate floor Wednesday, Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., touted "$1 trillion reduction in our deficit if we pass this bill, which we will, here in the Senate."

The CBO assessment Tuesday came as the pace of activity increased at both ends of the Capitol on an issue that President Barack Obama has placed at the top of his domestic agenda.

Challenged by protesters chanting, "Shame, shame," House Republicans advanced legislation to crack down on immigrants living illegally in the United States, while the Senate lurched ahead on a dramatically different approach offering the hope of citizenship to the same 11 million people.

The bill approved late Tuesday by the House Judiciary Committee on a 20-15 party-line vote would make being in the U.S. illegally a federal crime punishable by prison time, instead of a civil offense as it is now. It also would empower state and local law enforcement officials to enforce federal immigration laws.

Republicans said the bill was needed to ensure enforcement of the law and said the legislation was a first step in an incremental approach toward solving the immigration issue, in contrast to the comprehensive approach being taken by the Democratic-led Senate. Many in the Republican-controlled House oppose tackling the immigration issue with a single, big bill.

On Wednesday, the committee was to take up a bill creating a temporary agriculture worker program.

"There has to be a first step, Mr. Chairman, and enforcing the law seems to me a reasonable place to begin," said Republican Rep. Trey Gowdy of South Carolina, who wrote the bill approved Tuesday.

Democrats called the bill a dangerous retread of a similarly tough enforcement measure that sparked mass protests around the country in 2006.

Reading the bill, "you would think there are 11 million criminals in the United States," said Rep. Luis Gutierrez, D-Ill.

The opposition among many House Republicans to sweeping action on immigration was on display Wednesday as Rep. Steve King, R-Iowa, an immigration hardliner, convened a six-hour press conference outside the Capitol to highlight opposition to the bill. People in the crowd held signs opposing "illegal aliens" and criticizing Sen. Marco Rubio, R-Fla., a conservative author of the Senate bill, as "Obama's Idiot."

Opposition in his conference to any immigration bill with a path to citizenship has put House Speaker John Boehner, R-Ohio, into a difficult position. On Wednesday, a day after trying to reassure House Republicans that he wouldn't bring immigration legislation to the floor without majority support from Republicans, Boehner was to meet with the Congressional Hispanic Caucus, which includes many liberal Democrats who are eager to see the House act on far-reaching legislation.

In the Senate, a bipartisan bill that Obama supports appeared on track for a final vote as early as July 4.

The CBO said in its report and accompanying economic analysis that the Senate legislation would raise economic activity in each of the next two decades, in part because of the legal immigration fostered by the measure and also because millions of workers currently in the country illegally would join the legal workforce and pay taxes.

The CBO said the bill would increase gross domestic product by 3.3 percent over the next 10 years compared with current law and by 5.4 percent over the following decade. The agency forecast that 8 million people now here illegally would gain legal status under the bill.

The assessment was not all positive. CBO also said that average wages would decline through 2025 as a result of the bill and that unemployment would go up slightly. And it said that although unauthorized immigrants would find it harder to enter the country and find employment here if the bill became law, some aspects of the legislation would actually increase the illegal population. Some people would overstay visas issued under new temporary worker programs, CBO said, and overall the annual flow of residents here illegally would decrease only by about 25 percent compared with current law.

One critic quickly seized on the impact on pay.

"It's going to raise unemployment and push down wages," said Sen. Jeff Sessions of Alabama, top Republican on the Senate Budget Committee.

Supporters of the bill saw it differently.

Sen. Chuck Schumer, a New York Democrat and a member of the Gang of Eight, said the CBO report "debunks the idea that immigration reform is anything other than a boon to our economy and robs the bill's opponents of one of their last remaining arguments."

The report was issued near the end of a day of skirmishing on the Senate bill, during which senators rejected two amendments delaying legalization until certain security provisions were in place. One would have required additional fencing and the other a new biometric system to track entries into the country and exits.

Those proposals were overshadowed by a larger debate over the legislation's border security requirements, which Republicans generally want to toughen.

Sen. John Hoeven, R-N.D., is working on an amendment requiring the government to demonstrate an ability to apprehend 90 percent of those attempting to enter the country illegally before anyone already present can get a permanent resident green card.

Democrats have been skeptical of proposals along those lines, arguing that they could postpone legalization for years. But after intense discussions on the Senate floor, Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., and others said they were hopeful of progress.

In addition to border security and a path to citizenship, the bill includes an expanded number of visas for highly skilled workers prized by the technology industry and a new program for low-skilled workers.

___

Associated Press writer Andrew Taylor contributed to this report.


(Copyright 2013 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.)

Associated Press,

share this story:
facebook

157 Comments   |   Join the conversation »
  • Add A Comment 
  • Abuse
    SurpriseMe wrote...
    encourage human smuggling
    to citizenship for illegal immigrants. that only encourages people to cross our borders the wrong way. in fact one could say it encourages human smuggling. What about the Legal Immigrant? every immigrant needs to become legal first and earn their citizenship. We have path to citizenship today, in fact thousands every year do it legally.
  • Abuse
    Steve wrote...
    1986 was the overhaul of all overhauls
    and our government ignored it right after it's passing. The worst violator since has been Obama who has flat out ignored the laws and Constitution.
  • Abuse
    Steve wrote...
    If you think Obamacare is bad now
    Just wait till millions more are added if amnesty is passed.
  • Abuse
    wrote...
    The
    politicians created the problem wih poor enforcement of existing immigration laws....now they want to be heroes fixing something that they caused.
  • Abuse
    wrote...
    We do not need reform
    We need enforcement.
  • Abuse
    Michoacan wrote...
    Republicans see the writing on the wall.
    Demonstrate a commitment to fixing deficiencies in the immigration system, or face extinction.,
  • Abuse
    yrreta wrote...
    "Now, with some Republicans chastened
    by the November elections which demonstrated the importance of Latino voters and their increasing commitment to Democrats, some in the GOP say this time will be different." Or in other words, this is about harvesting votes, not necessarily what's best for the Country, but what's best for political careers.
  • Abuse
    wrote...
    back assward and corrupt
    So we are now rewarding lawbreakers and penalizing the successful. The inmates really are running the insane asylum in DC.
  • Abuse
    Steve wrote...
    Votes over Principles
    The GOP takes a page from the Democrats.
  • Abuse
    SurpriseMe wrote...
    selfish politicians
    if its not my bill then it must suck. why do each politicians have to have their own version of an immigration bill? why cant they all come together to have one? In business a team is put together to solve a problem, they seek input from different departments to see how each department is affected but in politics everyone has to have their own team. Politicians are so selfish.