Login

Register | Forgot Your Password? | Close
People shout out against the Strengthen and Fortify Enforcement Act in the hall outside the House Judiciary Committee hearing on Capitol Hill in Washington, Tuesday, June 18, 2013. The committee in the Republican-led House is preparing to cast its first votes on immigration this year, on a tough enforcement-focused measure that Democrats and immigrant groups are protesting loudly. (AP Photo/Carolyn Kaster)

WASHINGTON (AP) - Supporters of a far-reaching immigration bill in the Senate see fresh momentum from a report by the Congressional Budget Office that says the measure would boost the economy and reduce federal deficits by billions of dollars.

Congress' nonpartisan scorekeeping agency said Tuesday that the immigration bill would decrease federal red ink by $197 billion over a decade and $700 billion in the following 10 years as increased taxes paid to the government offset the cost of benefits for newly legal residents.

The White House said the report was "more proof that bipartisan commonsense immigration reform will be good for economic growth and deficit reduction." Several members of the "Gang of Eight" senators who drafted the legislation also welcomed the news.

The CBO assessment came as the pace of activity increased at both ends of the Capitol on an issue that President Barack Obama has placed at the top of his domestic agenda.

Challenged by protesters chanting, "Shame, shame," House Republicans advanced legislation to crack down on immigrants living illegally in the United States, while the Senate lurched ahead on a dramatically different approach offering the hope of citizenship to the same 11 million people.

The bill approved late Tuesday by the House Judiciary Committee on a 20-15 party-line vote would make being in the U.S. illegally a federal crime punishable by prison time, instead of a civil offense as it is now. It also would empower state and local law enforcement officials to enforce federal immigration laws.

Republicans said the bill was needed to ensure enforcement of the law and said the legislation was a first step in an incremental approach toward solving the immigration issue, in contrast to the comprehensive approach being taken by the Democratic-led Senate. Many in the Republican-controlled House oppose tackling the immigration issue with a single, big bill.

On Wednesday, the committee was to take up a bill creating a temporary agriculture worker program.

"There has to be a first step, Mr. Chairman, and enforcing the law seems to me a reasonable place to begin," said Republican Rep. Trey Gowdy of South Carolina, who wrote the bill approved Tuesday.

Democrats called the bill a dangerous retread of a similarly tough enforcement measure that sparked mass protests around the country in 2006.

Reading the bill, "you would think there are 11 million criminals in the United States," said Rep. Luis Gutierrez, D-Ill.

In the Senate, a bipartisan bill that Obama supports appeared on track for a final vote as early as July 4.

The CBO said in its report and accompanying economic analysis that the Senate legislation would raise economic activity in each of the next two decades, in part because of the legal immigration fostered by the measure and also because millions of workers currently in the country illegally would join the legal workforce and pay taxes.

The CBO said the bill would increase gross domestic product by 3.3 percent over the next 10 years compared with current law and by 5.4 percent over the following decade. The agency forecast that 8 million people now here illegally would gain legal status under the bill.

The CBO also said that average wages would decline through 2025 as a result of the bill and that unemployment would go up slightly.

One critic quickly seized on the impact on pay.

"It's going to raise unemployment and push down wages," said Sen. Jeff Sessions of Alabama, top Republican on the Senate Budget Committee. Supporters of the bill saw it differently.

Sen. Chuck Schumer, a New York Democrat and a member of the Gang of Eight, said the CBO report "debunks the idea that immigration reform is anything other than a boon to our economy and robs the bill's opponents of one of their last remaining arguments."

The report was issued near the end of a day of skirmishing on the Senate bill, during which senators rejected two amendments delaying legalization until certain security provisions were in place. One would have required additional fencing and the other a new biometric system to track entries into the country and exits.

Those proposals were overshadowed by a larger debate over the legislation's border security requirements, which Republicans generally want to toughen.

Sen. John Hoeven, R-N.D., is working on an amendment requiring the government to demonstrate an ability to apprehend 90 percent of those attempting to enter the country illegally before anyone already present can get a permanent resident green card.

Democrats have been skeptical of proposals along those lines, arguing that they could postpone legalization for years. But after intense discussions on the Senate floor, Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., and others said they were hopeful of progress.

In addition to border security and a path to citizenship, the bill includes an expanded number of visas for highly skilled workers prized by the technology industry and a new program for low-skilled workers.

___

Associated Press writer Andrew Taylor contributed to this report.


(Copyright 2013 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.)

Associated Press,

share this story:
facebook

156 Comments   |   Join the conversation »
  • Add A Comment 
  • Abuse
    Steve wrote...
    Food for thought
    Immigration agents have been left with no recourse but to sue their own Department, simply so that they like any other law officers will be allowed to do their job. The first task for every media agency in the country ought to be to study this lawsuit, to listen to the long documented complaints of ICE agents and to review the record of stymied attempts at congressional oversight of DHS. What good are promises of future enforcement when the Administration covertly undermines those laws now in place?
  • Abuse
    Steve wrote...
    The cost
    Creating a path to citizenship for so many illegal aliens would result in significant costs to state, local and federal governments. An often cited 2004 study that illegal immigrants paying taxes and getting access to such social services as Medicaid or food stamps would cost taxpayers $29 billion annually. Illegal aliens create a large deficit is not their heavy use of social services but their lack of education, which results in low paying jobs and small income tax contributions. If you think Obamacare is screwed up now just wait and see if Amnesty is passed.
  • Abuse
    1redcav wrote...
    Just say NO
    to amnesty!
  • Abuse
    Michoacan wrote...
    Steve throws his support behind a union
    which fights for what it sees as better working conditions. Oddly, he doesn't support other unions that want better and safer working conditions. Still, it's good to see his change of heart in backing the working man and collective action.
  • Abuse
    gilbert armenta wrote...
    It really is reassuring
    to hear all these people continuing to want to fight this. What that means is the GOP will continue to lose and ultimately be incapable of much of anything. Keep up the good fight you hardline GOPers, that's worked very well these past few years.
  • Abuse
    wrote...
    Have the GOP considered
    That Mitt Romney was the problem at the ballot box? This is an action which is doomed to failure. Current illegals have no desire to "pay" for their citizenship, as this bill basically requires. It will fail.
  • Abuse
    Steve wrote...
    The illegal are counting on Obama
    He is their Moses...leading them to the promised land.
  • Abuse
    Steve wrote...
    CIR will turn out to be a joke
    completely watered down by Obama and nothing will happen.
  • Abuse
    wrote...
    Please define "Border Security"
    Talk about a nebulous term ~ does anyone have a definition of Border Security? The border with Mexico runs 2,000 miles from Baja California through Texas - would a 2,000 mile fence make the "border security" advocates happy - and any enterprising person can tunnel under or climb over a fence. So how about guards every 200 ft. for 2,000 miles - that would require 50,000 border guards times 3 (150,000) working in 8-hr. shifts. Would the individual states (California, Arizona, New Mexico, Texas) work that into their budgets?
  • Abuse
    Steve wrote...
    Border security is not
    difficult. Washington makes if difficult.