Login

Register | Forgot Your Password? | Close

WASHINGTON (AP) - The mother of a 6-year-old boy killed in the Connecticut school shooting used the opportunity to fill in for President Barack Obama during the weekly radio and Internet address to make a personal plea from the White House for action to combat gun violence.

"Thousands of other families across the United States are also drowning in our grief," said Francine Wheeler, choking back tears in the address broadcast Saturday. "Please help us do something before our tragedy becomes your tragedy."

Ben Wheeler was among the 20 first-graders and six adults killed in the Dec. 14 attack at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown.

Francine Wheeler was the first person to deliver the address other than Obama or Vice President Joe Biden since the two took office in 2009.

Her husband, David Wheeler, sat silently next to her as she made the recording in the White House Library. Both wore the small green pins that have become a symbol of the shooting.

Obama asked Wheeler to deliver this week's address, which was taped Friday. The White House said Wheeler and her husband wrote the remarks.

"Sometimes, I close my eyes and all I can remember is that awful day waiting at the Sandy Hook Volunteer Firehouse for the boy who would never come home- the same firehouse that was home to Ben's Tiger Scout Den 6," Francine Wheeler said. "But other times, I feel Ben's presence filling me with courage for what I have to do, for him and all the others taken from us so violently and too soon."

Some of the Sandy Hook families, with Obama's blessing, have launched a stepped-up effort to push a gun control bill through Congress.

Obama traveled Monday to Hartford, Conn., about an hour's drive from Newtown, to make his case for action. On the return trip to Washington, he brought back 12 of the victims' family members, who have been meeting with senators.

The Senate is considering a Democratic bill backed by Obama that would expand background checks, strengthen laws against illegal gun trafficking and slightly increase school security aid. The bill passed its first hurdle on Thursday, and senators will vote on amendments to the legislation in the coming week.

Its fate in the Republican-controlled House is uncertain.

Shortly after the vote Thursday, White House spokesman Jay Carney said the voices of the Newtown families may have been the decisive factor.

In the Republicans' weekly address, freshman Rep. Jackie Walorski of Indiana criticized the tax increases Obama proposed in the $3.8 trillion budget blueprint he unveiled Wednesday, calling it "a blank check for more spending and more debt."

Although she acknowledged that Obama's budget "offers signs of common ground" in the form of entitlement reforms the GOP has previously requested, she said it's wrongheaded for Obama to insist he'll only agree to those reforms if Congress also agrees to higher taxes.


(Copyright 2013 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.)

share this story:
facebook

23 Comments   |   Join the conversation »
  • Add A Comment 
  • Abuse
    2cents wrote...
    It takes 2 seconds . . .
    . . . to change a clip. That would not slow any perpetrator down, as Biden brilliantly purports. But that works to convince his trusting, wide-eyed audience, as this regime so easily has been doing with their march on the Constitution. Oh, and he forgot to mention that wackos out to do evil are laughing at the notion that their weapon must be legally obtained and properly equipped. Laughing.
  • Abuse
    ZingerRinger wrote...
    Biden is an idiot
    Here is his quote about AR15 rifles- "You can't hit anything with them..." SO WHY ARE THEY TRYING TO BAN THEM?
  • Abuse
    Michoacan wrote...
    Smaller magazines give brave, 61 year old
    granny types (like Patricia Maisch, who interrupted Jared Loughner's reload) more opportunities to intervene and stop the killing. That is a good thing. Wackos know that they can go to gun nuts to buy all of the armaments that they need for their next first grade slaughter. Gun nuts don't really give a hoot who they sell their guns to, felons, psychos, angry domestically violent stalker spouses, American hating terrorists. It matters not to the gun nut. Public safety takes a back seat to their frothing, loony claims of Second Amendment defense of their collusive gun sales.
  • Abuse
    Steve wrote...
    Common sense eludes the Dems
    This will not stop tragedies like CT. CT, DC, IL, NY all have very strict gun laws and they have some of the wosrt gun violence. Gun free zones punish and create vicitims because they can't defent themselves and the criminals know that, that's why they are targeted.
  • Abuse
    Steve wrote...
    Dianne Feinstein is on record
    for being Anti Ameican and should be voted out of office when her term expires.
  • Abuse
    ZingerRinger wrote...
    Smaller magzines...
    Will save bullets, but not lives. "Assault" is an action, not an object. Your spoon did not make you fat...
  • Abuse
    Steve wrote...
    Liberals/Progressives have one message:
    "There is no reason to own a gun. We don't need a weapon suitable for warfare or ten bullets to kill a deer." They simply don't care that the second amendment was written to protect our God given rights to fight with and kill people. When some intruders break into your house or some muggers attack you on the street, you use as many bullets as the threat requires. The last thing you want to do is run out.
  • Abuse
    Steve wrote...
    The reason we have guns
    is to fight against armies, to protect our life, liberty and property from thieves. Why would politicians attempt to take away arms and surround themselves with armies of guards? To protect themselves against the crazy people, who have no fear for their lives and usually make it through or to protect themselves against the sane people, who hope to keep their liberty and their lives? Image how much better our country would be if politicians still had to worry about getting shot, in addition to losing elections, every time they consider legislations contrary to the Constitution.
  • Abuse
    Michoacan wrote...
    Gun nuts fight to ensure an unending supply and
    assortment of armaments for evildoers to select from. "Overall, about 1.4 million guns, or an annual average of 232,400, were stolen during burglaries and other property crimes in the six-year period from 2005 through 2010. Of these stolen firearms, at least 80% (186,800) had not been recovered at the time of the National Crime Victimization Survey (NCVS) interview." Gun nuts say to the cartelistas, "Why risk stealing my guns, when I would happily sell them to you?"
  • Abuse
    MolonLabe wrote...
    Hey Michoacan (part 1)
    Trading freedom for security doesn't work. You lose both the ability to defend yourself, and the right. The sad thing is you sound intelligent, so what you are doing is being willfully ignorant - the worst kind because it means at heart you are a coward. I accept that owning guns means that people without good intentions will use them commit crimes (much like us driving cars mean you may get hurt or die in an accident), but if you take them away from law abiding citizens all you do is make them victims.