Login

Register | Forgot Your Password? | Close

LOS ANGELES (AP) - A surfer who was shot at by police during the manhunt for rogue ex-cop Christopher Dorner has filed a lawsuit against a Los Angeles suburb and its police department.

David Perdue, 38, was driving his black Honda pickup early Feb. 7 on his way to pick up a friend to go surfing when he was stopped by officers looking for Dorner, an ex-Los Angeles police officer who had promised to bring "warfare" to his former department's officers and their families.

Authorities say Dorner killed four people, including two law enforcement officers, during a weeklong rampage that involved a massive manhunt and ended with his apparent suicide in a mountain cabin following a gunbattle with police.

At the time officers stopped Perdue, Dorner had already killed two people, and officers throughout the area were protecting people he named as targets. Authorities believed he was driving a pickup, although it was a different make and color than Perdue's truck.

The officers who stopped Perdue asked him a few questions, then told him to turn around and go back the way he came, according to the lawsuit.

Soon after, a second police car driving toward him accelerated to 25-30 mph "without any warning," and rammed his pickup, spinning him around and tearing off the rear axle. Air bags deployed and Perdue's upper body was jolted over the center console, he says in his complaint.

Perdue says the two officers fired at least three bullets into the open driver's side window, sending them into the side air bags, past his head and through the front windshield.

Perdue was ordered out of the pickup with a gun to his head and forced to lie face-down on the pavement. He was detained for an hour.

The lawsuit, filed Monday in federal court, says Perdue has suffered "physical injuries, severe emotional distress and mental suffering."

The complaint alleges that the city and its police department refused to accept responsibility for what happened and instead published false and conflicting accounts. It also states that the officers involved were allowed to return to duty without any discipline. Torrance police Sgt. Robert Watt said he can't comment on discipline issues, but the two officers involved returned to duty after a psychological evaluation, which is routine after such an incident.

The suit notes that Perdue, who is white, was much shorter and smaller and looked nothing like Dorner, who was black.

A statement from the city said they could not comment on specifics of the lawsuit. Watt said the department is in mediation and had a four hour session Thursday with Perdue's attorneys; no future date is yet set. The Los Angeles district attorney's office is investigating.

The Perdue shooting was not the only case of mistaken identity that morning. Two women delivering newspapers in Torrance were also shot at by Los Angeles police officers; the city reached a $4.2 million settlement with the women in April in addition to the $40,000 settlement for the loss of their pickup truck.

The eight officers involved in that incident are still working "non-field" assignments and Police Chief Charlie Beck will decide if and when they return to the field, said LAPD Cmdr. Andrew Smith.

___

Tami Abdollah can be reached at http://www.twitter.com/latams


(Copyright 2013 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.)

KTAR Newsroom,

share this story:
facebook

36 Comments   |   Join the conversation »
  • Add A Comment 
  • Abuse
    Michoacan wrote...
    Your approach, like most of KTAR's
    conservative commentators, is known as Straw man fallacy, yrreta. You simply ignore a person's actual position and make false attributions in its place. You are in essence arguing with yourself, but pretending to argue with the better informed and more cogent. It is the best that thumb suckers can do when faced with an untenable position.
  • Abuse
    yrreta wrote...
    Uhm, yeah Micho, that makes
    perfect sense. Forgot that Left wing nuts can ascertain a humans nature and predict how they will act based upon their future life experiences. Sorry my bad. Your answer sounds like you do not fully grasp the idea of not being able to control humans and their actions via law, legislation, banning, etc. I truly hope you get all that you want just so I can have the satisfaction of being able to say, "I told you so". Your sugar must be low this morning, go have another doughnut and watch some Oprah. I hear she thinks she's omnipotent, much like you.
  • Abuse
    Michoacan wrote...
    Yrreta thinks that laws should not
    be created if they do not prevent the all of the illegal behavior they are designed to deter and punish. The same sentiment expressed by his KTAR brethren. Since no law on the books has ever prevented child molestation, should we do away with those laws yrreta, and let the chomos have their way with our kids. I repeat, don't be ridiculous. Most gun control laws have been shown to be constitutional and have done some good, even if they don't prevent all gun violence.
  • Abuse
    yrreta wrote...
    Well, (sigh), this is pointless
    you make far too many assumptions, and determine a person’s point of view based on those assumptions to provide any value into the discussion. What a joy it must be to go through life in a delusional blur, looking forward to your next date at the nut bar. I've lost interest now.
  • Abuse
    Anti-deceptor wrote...
    Micho is not Mucho
    Ever notice how all of these looney shooters are liberals? Dorner was a liberal. So was the Aurora shooter. Gabby Giffords shooter also. Same for the Virginia Tech shooter. Liberals and mental illness. They go hand in hand. So, Micho, you ENFORCE the laws you have, not make new ones. Why are prosecutions of violations by criminals detected during a background check trying to purchase a firearm down 70% under Obamatard?
  • Abuse
    Michoacan wrote...
    Care to cite the source of your claim,
    Decepticon?
  • Abuse
    Anti-deceptor wrote...
    Micho is never cogent
    Over 2 million criminals were denied the purchase of a firearm since 1994 due to background checks being instituted. How many do you think the Feds have prosecuted? Almost none. And enforcement is down 70% now under Obama the Zero. Do you think those criminals or mentally ill people didn't ultimately obtain one? Naive. So Michump, how is increasing the number of background checks going to reduce violent crime or gun violence? It won't. The objective is by proxy registration of all firearms to permit confiscation. You don't read manifestos (Dorners and the Communist one), do you?
  • Abuse
    Anti-deceptor wrote...
    Do some research - and quit being lazy
    Emoticon (nothing but net).
  • Abuse
    Anti-deceptor wrote...
    Smackdown 1
    J. Patrick Bedell, the idiot who shot up the Pentagon checkpoint was a liberal. Bruce Edward Ivins, the anthrax mailer was a liberal. The Unabomber was a liberal. Cho, the Virginia Tech shooter was a liberal registered Democrat who railed incessantly about “the rich”. When he was failing in his business classes, he switched to English – and began shooting.
  • Abuse
    Anti-deceptor wrote...
    Smackdown 2 for the win
    The Aurora shooter considered himself “superior” to people around him and when he began failing out of his classes, he went shooting – when he wasn’t OWS protesting. Floyd Lee Corkins, who shot up the Family Research council was a liberal. Adam Lanza, the shooter at Newtown was a registered Democrat who despised Christians. Even Hasan, the Ft. Hood shooter, was registered as a Democrat.