Login

Register | Forgot Your Password? | Close

FORT MEADE, Md. (AP) - A huge database of troop names and email addresses an Army private allegedly downloaded to a personal computer could be used by foreign adversaries to launch cyberattacks on service members, a government witness said Monday as the trial of Pfc. Bradley Manning entered its third week.

Manning, a 25-year-old Oklahoma native, has acknowledged he sent more than 700,000 battlefield reports, diplomatic cables and other materials to the anti-secrecy website, but he pleaded not guilty to a charge of stealing a veritable address book of troops deployed to Iraq. The military's so-called "Global Address List" included the names, ranks, email addresses and positions of all 74,000 U.S. military personnel who were in Iraq in early 2010. WikiLeaks never published the list.

As part of the theft charge, prosecutors on Monday struggled and then abandoned an effort to prove the list had monetary value.

"Much more dangerous to us as the Army or as the government is the ability to ... to target individuals" with those emails, said CW4 Armand Rouillard, a cyberthreat analyst testifying for the prosecution.

Foreign adversaries could use them to "spear phish," or target those addresses with fake offers meant to trick troops into clicking on links that would download malicious programming onto their government computers, Rouillard said.

He was one of 10 witnesses to give evidence as prosecutors continued moving quickly through Manning's court-martial at Fort Meade, near Baltimore. The former Army intelligence analyst is charged with aiding the enemy. He has acknowledged sending reams of government secrets to WikiLeaks, but says he didn't think it would hurt national security. Manning says he leaked the material in order to expose wrongdoing.

The military judge, Col. Denise Lind, said no more evidence will be presented until June 26. She will hear oral arguments Tuesday on evidentiary issues. The prosecution and defense will spend the next week negotiating written statements to be submitted on behalf of 17 witnesses.

So far, the military judge has heard from more than 50 of the government's approximately 140 witnesses. Last week's testimony involved battlefield reports and videos. And still go come is evidence about 250,000 diplomatic cables Manning allegedly stole from a State Department database that WikiLeaks published.

Other testimony Monday included statements by a former official at the U.S. prison at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, who said sensitive documents were released regarding the system there.

Leaked threat assessments about detainees at the prison included personal information the U.S. had gathered on them as well as information on how they were captured, who they associated with and so on, said Jeffrey Motes, an intelligence analyst at the prison who gave evidence in a written statement Monday. He said the documents included recommendations for handling of the detainees and might have included information the prisoners did not know the U.S. had collected on them.

A former Guantanamo commander, Rear Adm. David Woods, said in a statement the documents also revealed sources of U.S. intelligence and other types of information that "could be expected to cause serious damage to the national security of the United States" if publicly released.

___

AP writer David Dishneau contributed to this story from Fort Meade.


(Copyright 2013 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.)

share this story:
facebook

8 Comments   |   Join the conversation »
  • Add A Comment 
  • Abuse
    tom85013 wrote...
    I don't care if he is gay
    I care very deeply that he aided the enemy. More so becasue my son is in Afghanistan presently and his actions may put him in greater jeopardy than he currently is. And let's stop sugar coating it, it's TREASON. What happened to the good old days when that was a capital offense? Give my best to Eddie Slovik when you see him Pfc. Manning.
  • Abuse
    Non-point wrote...
    Gay?
    Your comment is whats wrong with this country right now. Have you ever thought maybe your son shouldn't be there? That he is doing something wrong for a misguided country? I understand this man needs to be punished and I also respect him for doing what was right in his views instead of the ole "just doing what I'm told to". Patriots come in all forms not just American uniforms. FYI Sometime standing for what you believe in means standing alone.
  • Abuse
    6thCavAirCav wrote...
    I don't see him as a Patriot
    This is a man joined the Military he was not drafted he raised his hand a swore and oather to protect the country, it ideals and to follow the order to the best of his ability. He violated his position and released classified material. Period end of story. Years ago you would have never heard about this situation. He is a traitor and should have a sumary execution as is called out through the military code of justice for act treason during a declared war.
  • Abuse
    6thCavAirCav wrote...
    I don't see cont'
    All you who say he did what he needed to be a Patriot have a very warped sense of right and wrong. You are the reason this country is in the mess it is in.
  • Abuse
    misterosr wrote...
    @6cavaircav
    I agree with most of your statyement but as this "war" has NOT been "declared" by congress it falls outside of the UCMJ "summary execution" rule. Which means that they can sentence however the see fit. If however he is found guilty of treason then the sentence could and should be death.
  • Abuse
    wrote...
    TRAITOR and TREASON
    Pvt Manning is a traitor and a sick piece of scum. He has betrayed his country and his fellow servicemen and has a warped sense of right and wrong like the sickos that support his actions.
  • Abuse
    Constitutionalist wrote...
    Good intentions?
    How is disobeying orders after swearing an oath to follow them good intentions?! This man needs to be executed for treason, plain and simple.
  • Abuse
    UZI wrote...
    Stauffenburg was a traitor too!
    If any should know that the gov doesn't put factual info out there it should be the people on this site. How bout we observe all the facts and most importantly the why of the facts. Did he have someone on our side who would bring to light some of this corruption? Why hasn't Pat Tillmans amongst many other cases been fully understood. How come the media just does a drive by like the paper boy instead of keeping us apprised of all the turns of events in this case? I've been around long enough to know we've not seen a thimbles full of facts yet.
  • 1