Login

Register | Forgot Your Password? | Close

PHOENIX -- A Republican-sponsored bill barring enforcement of new federal guns laws sparked passionate debate in an Arizona Senate committee that ultimately passed the bill Wednesday.

The party-line vote moved the first of several anti-gun control bills introduced in the Legislature to the floor on the same day the U.S. Congress heard a plea from former U.S. Rep. Gabrielle Giffords to pass new gun control laws.

The bill co-sponsored by state Sen. Don Shooter, four other senators and several members of the House of Representatives would bar enforcement of new federal laws affecting semi-automatic firearms or high-capacity magazines. It also makes any federal official trying to enforce such laws guilty of a felony and allows the state Attorney General to defend anyone prosecuted for violating federal gun laws if the gun was made in Arizona, among other provisions.

Wednesday's Senate Public Safety Committee debate pitted minority Democrats who believe the bill is unconstitutional against Republicans opposed to what they call an overreaching federal government. An identical bill has been introduced in the House, which also has seen several other gun-related bills introduced since the session began Jan 14.

The bills were prompted by President Barack Obama's push to reinstate an assault weapons ban and ban high-capacity magazines in the wake of December's school shooting in Connecticut.

Rep. Eddie Ableser, D-Tempe, set off the fireworks with his sharp questioning of principal bill sponsor Sen. Kelli Ward, R-Lake Havasu City, who said ``basically it is a statement because I am very impassioned about Arizona state rights.

``I believe the federal government has taken liberties that they are not at liberty to take, especially in encroaching on our Second Amendment rights,'' Ward said.

Ableser called the bill a waste of time and asked exactly how a local law enforcement officer was going to stop a federal agent from enforcing the law.

That's prompted Shooter to interrupt.

``The country is called the United States, it's not called the federal government,'' Shooter said. ``The states are sovereign.''

The debate in the committee room echoed similar ones in several statehouses. Opponents of more federal gun control have introduced nearly identical bills in states including Wyoming, where a bill served as a template for the one introduced here. They've been prompted by worries among some conservatives that Obama may take executive action to ban some weapons.

In fact, a series of executive orders Obama issued Jan. 16 did not try to ban any guns or ammunition but mainly addressed health care rules, gun tracing and background checks and school safety. Obama's proposals that would outlaw new assault rifle sales and limit magazine size require congressional action.

If passed in both chambers and signed by Gov. Jan Brewer, the bill considered Wednesday would likely set up Arizona for another fight with the federal government, like that it faced when it passed SB1070, the state's crackdown on illegal immigration. The federal government ultimately sued, arguing federal law was supreme, and most of the major parts of the law were declared unconstitutional by the U.S. Supreme Court.

Sen. Chester Crandell, the committee chairman, acknowledged as much.

``Eventually this whole gun discussion of Second Amendment rights is going to be taken to the Supreme Court,'' he said. ``Because it's not just an issue here in Arizona.''

Associated Press,

share this story:
facebook

7 Comments   |   Join the conversation »
  • Add A Comment 
  • Abuse
    wrote...
    Only in Arizona ~
    Our legislators again wasting valuable time on agendas that hurt rather than help the citizens of this state. And they know and so does anyone who has taken a Constitutional Law course that it will never fly - just more time wasted going through our court system before it's "SHOT DOWN."
  • Abuse
    Constitutionalist wrote...
    Do it right, or no new "laws"
    If the government wants to ban possession of any firearms, whether it be pistols, assault rifles, or whatever, then let them do so by making a constitutional amendment that amends the second amendment. If the federal government doesn't do that, then I fully agree with this bill, as well as any other, that says you cannot change laws that are already on the books without going through the proper legal process. Period. (and last I checked constitutional amendments trump all other laws, hence the phrase a law is unconstitutional and has no validity)
  • Abuse
    Steve wrote...
    Arizona joins a growing number of
    States, law enforcement agencies and other government bodies who are telling Obama and the Left to go pound sand with their anti gun agenda.
  • Abuse
    Michoacan wrote...
    Somehow the Republic survived the
    registration requirements of the 1934 National Firearms Act and successor laws which outlaw the unregistered possession of automatic weapons, destructive devices, short barrel shotguns, etc. Gun nuts and the NRA want us to believe that the fabric of the universe will unravel should something so simple as universal background checks be enacted.
  • Abuse
    Michoacan wrote...
    Arizona's conservative legislators admonish
    others to obey the laws, something from which they feel themselves exempt. One can be excused for scoffing at their hypocrisies.
  • Abuse
    Steve wrote...
    Universal background checks
    is a failed idea from the start. Criminals will continue to get guns without a background check just like they do now. The Feds don't prosecute using the laws on the books now, what makes you think they will do it now.
  • Abuse
    Steve wrote...
    The Federal Government will be hard pressed
    to find very many federal agents willing to act on any type of infringment on the 2nd amendment.
  • 1

World Class Arizona

  • Avnet

    World Class People. World Class Company. Here's information on a Fortune 500 company from Arizona.

Voice For A Better Arizona