Login

Register | Forgot Your Password? | Close
People shout out against the Strengthen and Fortify Enforcement Act in the hall outside the House Judiciary Committee hearing on Capitol Hill in Washington, Tuesday, June 18, 2013. The committee in the Republican-led House is preparing to cast its first votes on immigration this year, on a tough enforcement-focused measure that Democrats and immigrant groups are protesting loudly. (AP Photo/Carolyn Kaster)

WASHINGTON (AP) - Illegal immigration into the United States would decrease by only 25 percent under a far-reaching Senate immigration bill, according to an analysis by the Congressional Budget Office that also finds the measure reduces federal deficits by billions.

Supporters of the legislation moving toward a vote on the Senate floor seized on the deficit-reduction findings by Congress' nonpartisan scorekeeping agency, along with the agency's forecast that the immigration measure would boost economic growth as millions of workers join the workforce and begin to pay taxes.

But the CBO report also found that the bill, which takes steps to prevent people coming to the U.S. illegally while offering the hope of citizenship to some 11 million people already here without authorization, does not come close to ending illegal immigration. Indeed some aspects of the bill would make the problem worse, the report said.

"Unauthorized residents would find it harder both to enter the country and to find employment while unauthorized. However, other aspects of the bill would probably increase the number of unauthorized residents- in particular, people overstaying their visas issued under the new programs for temporary workers," the CBO report said, adding that the net annual flow of unauthorized residents would decrease by about 25 percent compared to current law.

That would amount to 2.5 million fewer immigrants coming to the U.S. illegally over the next 20 years than would happen under current law, the CBO said.

Conservative activists were circulating the finding Wednesday morning.

But a spokesman for Sen. Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., a lead author of the immigration bill, questioned that CBO conclusion.

"The report does not question the toughness of the bill's border security reforms, it just assumes that some immigrants who enter the country legally will overstay their visas," said Schumer spokesman Brian Fallon. "But the bill creates a system to track people who overstay their visas and prevents employers from hiring them, so the number is likely to be much lower than CBO projects."

The issue arose as senators were jockeying over amendments to the legislation, which would allow tens of thousands of new legal workers into the country for jobs in everything from high-tech companies to hotels to agriculture. The bill also sets out a 13-year process whereby millions could ultimately obtain citizenship, as long as certain goals on border security are met first.

Republicans have contended those "triggers" aren't strict enough and have been offering amendments to strengthen these. Authors of the legislation say some of these efforts go too far and would delay the path to citizenship.

But Republican Sens. John Hoeven of North Dakota and Bob Corker of Tennessee were working on what they hoped could be a compromise measure that would lay out numerous specific steps for the government to take in order to secure the border, and potentially call for the government to demonstrate an ability to apprehend the vast majority of those attempting to enter the country illegally before anyone already present can obtain a permanent resident green card.

Hoeven and Corker were looking at packaging their amendment with others on enforcement issues by other Republican senators in hopes of building a bipartisan consensus for the bill.

"We have some people on our side of the aisle that just are not going to support the immigration bill, period," Corker said Tuesday. "But I think there are a number of people on our side of the aisle that, if we could just get it tailored a little bit with a few other amendments, might be willing to send it over to the House. And there are a lot of people who think it might come back over here in a little better form than it leaves."

The GOP-led House was confronting its own obstacles on immigration. Late Tuesday, the House Judiciary Committee agreed on a party-line 20-15 vote to approve a tough enforcement-focused immigration bill, over objections from Democrats and chants of "Shame, shame" from protesters. The measure would make being in the U.S. illegally a federal crime punishable by prison time, instead of a civil offense as it is now. It also would empower state and local law enforcement officials to enforce federal immigration laws.

On Wednesday, the committee was to take up a bill creating a temporary agriculture worker program.

The opposition among many House Republicans to sweeping action on immigration was on display Wednesday as Rep. Steve King, R-Iowa, an immigration hardliner, convened a six-hour press conference outside the Capitol to highlight opposition to the Senate bill. People in the crowd held signs opposing "illegal aliens" and criticizing Sen. Marco Rubio, R-Fla., a conservative author of the Senate bill, as "Obama's Idiot."

Opposition in his conference to any immigration bill with a path to citizenship put House Speaker John Boehner, R-Ohio, into a difficult position. On Wednesday, a day after trying to reassure House Republicans that he wouldn't bring immigration legislation to the floor without majority support from Republicans, Boehner was to meet with the Congressional Hispanic Caucus, which includes many liberal Democrats who are eager to see the House act on far-reaching legislation.

In the Senate, the bipartisan bill that President Barack Obama supports appeared on track for a final vote as early as July 4.

The CBO said in its report and accompanying economic analysis that the Senate legislation would raise economic activity in each of the next two decades, in part because of the legal immigration fostered by the measure and also because millions of workers currently in the country illegally would join the legal workforce and pay taxes.

The CBO said the bill would increase gross domestic product by 3.3 percent over the next 10 years compared with current law and by 5.4 percent over the following decade.

CBO also said that the immigration bill would decrease federal red ink by $197 billion over a decade and $700 billion in the following 10 years as increased taxes paid to the government offset the cost of benefits for newly legal residents. The legislation would cost about $2 billion annually to implement over the next 20 years.

CBO also said that average wages would decline through 2025 as a result of the bill and that unemployment would go up slightly.

___

Associated Press writer Andrew Taylor contributed to this report.


(Copyright 2013 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.)

Associated Press,

share this story:
facebook

159 Comments   |   Join the conversation »
  • Add A Comment 
  • Abuse
    Steve wrote...
    Food for thought
    Immigration agents have been left with no recourse but to sue their own Department, simply so that they like any other law officers will be allowed to do their job. The first task for every media agency in the country ought to be to study this lawsuit, to listen to the long documented complaints of ICE agents and to review the record of stymied attempts at congressional oversight of DHS. What good are promises of future enforcement when the Administration covertly undermines those laws now in place?
  • Abuse
    Steve wrote...
    The cost
    Creating a path to citizenship for so many illegal aliens would result in significant costs to state, local and federal governments. An often cited 2004 study that illegal immigrants paying taxes and getting access to such social services as Medicaid or food stamps would cost taxpayers $29 billion annually. Illegal aliens create a large deficit is not their heavy use of social services but their lack of education, which results in low paying jobs and small income tax contributions. If you think Obamacare is screwed up now just wait and see if Amnesty is passed.
  • Abuse
    1redcav wrote...
    Just say NO
    to amnesty!
  • Abuse
    Michoacan wrote...
    Steve throws his support behind a union
    which fights for what it sees as better working conditions. Oddly, he doesn't support other unions that want better and safer working conditions. Still, it's good to see his change of heart in backing the working man and collective action.
  • Abuse
    gilbert armenta wrote...
    It really is reassuring
    to hear all these people continuing to want to fight this. What that means is the GOP will continue to lose and ultimately be incapable of much of anything. Keep up the good fight you hardline GOPers, that's worked very well these past few years.
  • Abuse
    wrote...
    Have the GOP considered
    That Mitt Romney was the problem at the ballot box? This is an action which is doomed to failure. Current illegals have no desire to "pay" for their citizenship, as this bill basically requires. It will fail.
  • Abuse
    Steve wrote...
    The illegal are counting on Obama
    He is their Moses...leading them to the promised land.
  • Abuse
    Steve wrote...
    CIR will turn out to be a joke
    completely watered down by Obama and nothing will happen.
  • Abuse
    wrote...
    Please define "Border Security"
    Talk about a nebulous term ~ does anyone have a definition of Border Security? The border with Mexico runs 2,000 miles from Baja California through Texas - would a 2,000 mile fence make the "border security" advocates happy - and any enterprising person can tunnel under or climb over a fence. So how about guards every 200 ft. for 2,000 miles - that would require 50,000 border guards times 3 (150,000) working in 8-hr. shifts. Would the individual states (California, Arizona, New Mexico, Texas) work that into their budgets?
  • Abuse
    Steve wrote...
    Border security is not
    difficult. Washington makes if difficult.

World Class Arizona

  • Go Daddy

    World Class People. World Class Company. Go Daddy is a Fortune 100 "Best Companies to Work For."
  • Avnet

    World Class People. World Class Company. Here's information on a Fortune 500 company from Arizona.

Voice For A Better Arizona