Bonneville Phoenix Network
 KTAR News
 Arizona Sports
92.3 FM KTAR
close_menu
LATEST NEWS
Updated Aug 13, 2014 - 3:46 pm

Appeals court says Arizona transgender man can keep pursuing divorce

PHOENIX — A transgender man in Arizona who gave birth to three children
after beginning to change from female to male can continue to pursue a divorce,
a state appeals court said Wednesday in reversing a judge who refused to end the
marriage.

A three-judge panel of the Arizona Court of Appeals ruled that Thomas Beatie’s
marriage to Nancy Beatie in Hawaii in 2003 is considered valid in Arizona and
concluded it wasn’t a same-sex union.

Last year, a lower court judge denied the divorce request and ruled that
Arizona’s ban on same-sex marriages prevented the marriage from being recognized
as valid.

Beatie began to change sex before the marriage but retained female reproductive
organs and became pregnant three times with donated sperm when Nancy Beatie was
unable to have children. The couple eventually moved to Arizona and sought a
divorce a few years later.

Thomas Beatie was born a woman in Hawaii and as an adult underwent a
double-mastectomy and chest reconstruction surgeries, and began testosterone
hormone therapy and psychological treatment to become a man.

Sixteen months ago, Maricopa County Family Court Judge Douglas Gerlach
concluded the marriage appeared to be a same-sex union because it was between a
woman and a person who was capable of giving birth.

The family court judge also found he had no jurisdiction to handle the divorce
request because there was insufficient evidence that Beatie was a man when he
got married, even though he had his Hawaii driver’s license and birth
certificate changed to say he was a man.

The Arizona appeals court ruled that Beatie’s marriage in Hawaii was valid and
noted that he didn’t withhold his transgender status from officials in Hawaii.

The panel said it was obligated to let people who get their birth certificates
changed to reflect a new gender status the rights connected to their amended
status _ and doing otherwise would run afoul of equal-protection rights
protections.

Comments

comments powered by Disqus