Bonneville Phoenix Network
 KTAR News
 Arizona Sports
92.3 FM KTAR
close_menu
LATEST NEWS
Updated Dec 4, 2013 - 8:24 pm

Rare third trial begins in temple killings case

PHOENIX — One of Arizona’s most notorious murder cases is in court again
for a rare third trial as prosecutors seek a conviction in the killings of nine
people, including six monks, at a suburban Phoenix Buddhist temple in 1991.

Johnathan A. Doody, now 39, was just 17 when he was accused of participating in
the August 1991 slayings at the Wat Promkunaram temple. He was found guilty in
1993 and sentenced to 281 years in prison, but an appeals court threw out his
conviction in 2011 after ruling that investigators improperly obtained his
confession.

Doody went on trial again in August, but a judge declared a mistrial in October
after jurors failed to reach a verdict.

Doody, who remains incarcerated, has maintained his innocence. His defense team
said Wednesday during opening statements that the prosecution’s case hinges only
on the word of a convicted murderer.

However, Prosecutor Jason Kalish pointed to Doody as the one who “executed
nine of his fellow human beings.”

Another man, Allesandro “Alex” Garcia, pleaded guilty in the killings and was
sentenced to life in prison in exchange for his testimony against Doody and a
promise that prosecutors wouldn’t seek the death penalty.

Garcia, who was 16 at the time of the killings and testified again at the
second trial, said the crime was Doody’s idea and that the two wanted to steal
gold and cash from the monks. Authorities said the robbers made away with about
$2,600 and other valuables.

All nine victims were shot in the back of the head. Doody’s brother and mother
were members of the temple.

The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals overturned Doody’s conviction and ruled
his confession inadmissible partly because he wasn’t properly read his rights.

In the confession, Doody said he went to the temple during the robbery but
claimed he was outside when the shootings occurred.

The appeals court’s decision meant prosecutors couldn’t use Doody’s confession
at his retrial and instead relied largely on Garcia’s testimony.

Garcia said Doody was determined to leave no witnesses and shot each victim.
Items taken from the temple were found at Garcia’s house, where Doody was
staying at the time.

Defense attorneys say Garcia lied then, and is still lying, while prosecutors
argue the two were equally culpable in the crime.

Garcia plans to testify again.

Doody was spared the death penalty in his first trial.

Prosecutors couldn’t seek the death penalty in Doody’s second trial because of
a 2005 U.S. Supreme Court decision that prohibits authorities from pursuing that
punishment against defendants who were under 18 years old when the crime
occurred.

Comments

comments powered by Disqus